Kaichos Man, please read the words, not what you want them to be.
"What I want to emphasize is that relaxation of natural selection is the prerequisite for new evolutionary progress."Kimura 1991
Being a prerequisite for
new evolutionary progress, curiously, does not say that natural selection
causes variations rather than allowing more to exist. In other words, this does not prove your point in the slightest, and in fact is consistent with what you have been told is being said as opposed to your erroneous interpretation.
and:
"(i) A population is liberated from the preexisting selective constraint. (ii) Thereis a sudden increase or boom of neutral variations under relaxed selection."
Emphasis. Added.
And again, this does not state that the relaxed selection
causes the increase or boom in neutral variations, only that more variations are allowed to exist. Let me rearrange his statement by switching the two parts of the sentence:
"(i) A population is liberated from the preexisting selective constraint. (ii) under relaxed selection There is a sudden increase or boom of neutral variations ..."
Because of the relaxed constraints on the amount of variation allowed in the population, more new variations due to mutations and genetic drift survive to be passed on to following generations than was allowed under the previous selection constraints.
When you relax the selection criteria for immigration there is a sudden boom of additional people immigrating. The relaxation of the selection criteria doesn't cause these people to suddenly exist out of the blue, rather it allows existing people to immigrate that didn't meet the previous selection criteria.
When you open a water tap, more water passes through the tap than passed before the valve was opened. Opening the tap doesn't suddenly cause more water to exist.
When you open a door, more people can pass through the door than could pass before the door was opened. Opening the door doesn't suddenly cause more people to exist.
It is really, truly, a simple concept.
Enjoy.