Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 115 (8796 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 10-20-2017 10:27 AM
347 online now:
granpa, halibut, PaulK, scoff, Son Goku, Tangle (6 members, 341 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Upcoming Birthdays: Flyer75
Happy Birthday: Astrophile
Post Volume:
Total: 820,900 Year: 25,506/21,208 Month: 1,133/2,338 Week: 254/450 Day: 19/55 Hour: 0/4

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Is ID properly pursued?
Posts: 1808
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010
Member Rating: 2.2

Message 93 of 94 (737728)
09-29-2014 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by taiji2
09-28-2014 10:08 AM

taiji2 writes:

I am, however, an avid reader of both and think myself capable of honest curiosity along the way.

Actually, if you were really that interested, you would take a course or two on the subject at Uni.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by taiji2, posted 09-28-2014 10:08 AM taiji2 has not yet responded

Posts: 3951
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Message 94 of 94 (737731)
09-29-2014 6:39 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by taiji2
09-28-2014 10:08 AM

Rational thought should not be presumed contained only within the confines of any profession.

This is true. But it should be thought of as confined to the scientific method or philiosphy.

The problem is that it is not possible to conclude that something is designed as we have no evidence for the need for design: we only have incredulity that something could not be designed.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by taiji2, posted 09-28-2014 10:08 AM taiji2 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017