Just as a Lamarckian can be a true scientist who believes in evolution in a Lamarckian manner.
And they would be just as wrong to believe this as to believe in special creation, would they not?
To believe that something is true in spite of the evidence to the contrary is not the mark of a scientist, surely?
Well, no, obviously, you can't interpret the evidence in a biblical creation account framework without thinking this is the correct framework to interpret them with.
Kinda kills credability right there, I reckon.
Edited by Larni, : Second point.