quote:
You are changing the goalpost, since we are not discussing creationist science peer-reviewed papers.
I think that you mean that he is objecting to your attempt to move the goalposts. Neither Sarfati's published work (I presume that you mean "Thermoelectric power and electron-phonon enhancement in YBa2Cu3O7-8" ?) nor even Stanford's make them especially well informed about evolution. Much the same can be said for Behe.
quote:
I am adressing your initial stance that there are no true scientists who know what they are talking about on the creationist side of the debate. This is the position you had that I adressed.
In order to adress this, I used the fact that creationist publish in peer-reviewed journals, just liek every other scientist, and that they do research, just like every other scientist. And that, in fact, they know what they are talking about, just like every other scientist.
Which would be shown by them actually writing peer-reviewed papers that support the creationist position would it not ? It certainly can't be shown by pointing to Sarfati co-authoring an unrelated paper more than twenty years ago.
Sarfati's current output is more on these lines:
The Links are MissingYou may remember it, since I introduced it as an example of a long-discredited argument still being used by CMI.
quote:
Therefore, that they were ''true scientists who know what they are talking about'', and so contradicting your position that no such thing existed.
So you are actually arguing that we should assume that Sarfati is an expert on evolutionary biology, doing real research in the field based on his co-authorship of a paper on "Thermoelectric power and electron-phonon enhancement in YBa2Cu3O7-8", more than twenty years ago ?