quote:
For all of you who don't already know, here is the dilemma:
"Is what is moral commanded by God because it is moral, or is it moral because it is commanded by God?"
I never knew this had a name. Learn something new everyday. May I babble until the theists get here?
Given the time frame the laws (not just the ten) or morals of the Bible were really written, I would say that attributing them to God is what gave authority to the morals of the time. Many of them have been dropped or changed over time. The more universal morals (lying, stealing, murder) still remain. The oral law was created so that the laws could adjust with the society.
When the rules came down, no one seemed surprised. God didn't seem to give them any significantly different morals than what they already had.
I don't think it's about intermediary, but about authority.
So I would say it was a matter of giving higher authority to morals they already had.
Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion