Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,822 Year: 4,079/9,624 Month: 950/974 Week: 277/286 Day: 38/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Euthypro Dilemna
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 9 of 181 (537537)
11-29-2009 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by purpledawn
11-29-2009 8:28 AM


Re: Authority for Morals
I don't think it's about intermediary, but about authority.
So I would say it was a matter of giving higher authority to morals they already had.
So then, god isn't required for morals?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 8:28 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Stile, posted 11-29-2009 10:56 AM hooah212002 has replied
 Message 12 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 11:12 AM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 10 of 181 (537543)
11-29-2009 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Teapots&unicorns
11-28-2009 9:03 PM


Why bother with a flawed creation?
he DID create us perfectly, in his image. rib woman screwed that up for us. It's our fault as mankind for electing her as our representative.
I think the typical response to this question would go something like this: God IS. It is not a choice for god to make to be "good" or "moral". He IS those things. Anything that goes against his will is what is deemed as "bad" or "immoral". He IS the law.
Does it sit well with me personally? nope.
Now, to bat for the right team. if you were to create, say, a childrens toy, and the second one you ever made (using parts from the first) ripped a childs finger off, would you not shoot for a different design? or would you create millions of them, damaging every child in the world? oh, but wait: you have a recall lined up a few thousand years down the road tht will fix the problem (screw all the kids who already lost their finger). However, you only tell a select few about this recall, and in such a way that it sounds untrue or muddied, so many choose not to opt in for the recall. Tough, they lose their fingers.
I guess his choice lies not in being "good", but in being a prick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 11-28-2009 9:03 PM Teapots&unicorns has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 13 of 181 (537564)
11-29-2009 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Stile
11-29-2009 10:56 AM


Re: God is not Perfect
I agree, for the most part. The part i am in contention with is this:
Stile writes:
....Therefore, I would answer that God does what is Good because there is a greater Good that God answers to...
If god answers to ANYONE at all, he isn't the abrahamic lord of all as depicted in the bible. This depiction you stated creates your own personal god. For me? I have absolutely NO problem with that, however, with regards to the subject at hand, I don't think it quite fits. As a matter of fact, it is similar to what I am spinning in my head as what I think god, if there is such a thing, is: a force of nature. not a figure, but life in and of itself. Thinking that way, genesis becomes more clear, provided you take it allegorically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Stile, posted 11-29-2009 10:56 AM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Stile, posted 11-29-2009 5:15 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 14 of 181 (537565)
11-29-2009 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by purpledawn
11-29-2009 11:12 AM


Re: Authority for Morals
So god IS what man makes him? is god not the ruler of all? Since when do we (mankind) make the rules?
More fuel, IMO, for god being a manmade invention.
IMO, he reflects the morals of the people enforcing or preaching the morals.
So, god is a pedophile when a child molesting preacher is preaching about him?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 11:12 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 11:43 AM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 16 of 181 (537572)
11-29-2009 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by purpledawn
11-29-2009 11:43 AM


Re: Authority for Morals
Gods are the personification of nature. That personification took on a life of its own in some religions.
You're a literalist, so let me ask: where does it say this in the bible? (I don't mean this facetiously, I admittely have not read the bible cover to cover)
IMO, the OP was referring to the bible MOST christians read and adhere to. I am feeling like we are deviating from "the norm" (this IS an evolution vs. CREATIONISM site, so I assume fundy christianity is the main topic at hand). Not too many fundimental christians have this belief in god, one that god is just a force. God is normally portrayed as a figure.
Now, I'm not saying you are incorrect, but for the topic at hand, I don't think it is the correct way to view the subject. Note what I replied to Stile, this is similar to my way of thinking.
Who rules, man or nature?
Again, same problem. If you are saying god is nothing more than a force of nature, I have no qualms. However, the god of the bible is more than a force of nature. How else would he show himself to Moses? That implies a figure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 11:43 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 2:27 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 18 of 181 (537601)
11-29-2009 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by purpledawn
11-29-2009 2:27 PM


Re: Authority for Morals
Oops. Sorry, I forgot that part of your first post. Disregard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by purpledawn, posted 11-29-2009 2:27 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 26 of 181 (537731)
11-30-2009 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by AChristianDarkly
11-30-2009 2:54 PM


Re: The Rationality of Evil
Consequently, simply being ‘reasonable’ directly implies most of what is considered as being evil, as being the ‘rational’ thing to do/be: stealing, murder, rape, etc.
so, rationality equates evilness. check.
Still, if atheists are in general incapable of admitting the influence of the conviction of the truth of ToE on their choices.
No more than the theory of relativity does. The TOE is a section of science. It is a study, not a beleif. What about science scares you twits?
The problem with most of those on this forum, of course, is that there is no way on earth you can all admit that being a -rational- atheist directly implies being a demoniac.
Seriously?
rationally, am I wrong?
Yes
Are we not, each and every one, commanded by the dictates of reason to walk a path named ‘Evil’?
no, only you christians. The rest of us are just fine. We are only classified as such by :GASP: christians.
Note. I am not a sociopath.
I really question the validity of that statement.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by AChristianDarkly, posted 11-30-2009 2:54 PM AChristianDarkly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by AChristianDarkly, posted 11-30-2009 6:27 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 31 of 181 (537765)
11-30-2009 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Teapots&unicorns
11-30-2009 6:47 PM


Re: The Rationality of Evil
A mere few posts, and I realize already that rational, logical thinking is lost on this chap. Hence why I cannot bring myself to respond to his mindless lunacy.
Thanks T&U.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 11-30-2009 6:47 PM Teapots&unicorns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 11-30-2009 7:45 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 50 of 181 (538378)
12-06-2009 7:52 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by iano
12-06-2009 4:25 AM


If he did and good was still defined as what God did/is then I unlikely consider God good according to another definition - say humanities general definition (which I also share).
So if you don't like what god says, go with man's point of view? How would god like that? How do you wrangle that in your head? Isn't god the final say?
(I think humanities sense of good/evil closely aligns with Gods sense of good/evil in many regards: especially when your dealing with man and his aspirational view on good and evil. When it comes to man and his own interests then even mans sense of good/evil frequently goes by the wayside)
Is it not possible that the qualities attributed to god were that of what man strived for? Attributes superimposed on this eternal being, placed there by the sheep herders who concocted him up?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by iano, posted 12-06-2009 4:25 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by iano, posted 12-06-2009 4:17 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 59 of 181 (538454)
12-07-2009 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by iano
12-07-2009 6:14 AM


I guess you think this is good: http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2007/02/this_is_what_god_told_me_to_do.php This pastor sexually abused women "because god told him to". You must think he was doing the right thing, right? He was doing good? Who are we to question the almighty god?
What about all these people, did they do good? Were they good people?
God ordered parents' deaths. "God told me to" kill his parents, Philip Badowsky, 22, testified. He read the bible before shooting his parents, then dismembered them with a chainsaw on Dec. 2. His mother was a nurse and his father was an engineer in Nixson, Tenn. Source: Chattanoogan.com, Dec. 10, 2004
"Act of obedience." Edwin B. Baxter, 33, of Oregon, was convicted in December of attempting to circumcise his 8-year-old son. The fundamentalist Christian, who sat with a bible in the courtroom, decided to circumcise his son on Sept. 3 after reading the Old Testament: "I had no reason to think I would be in violation of any of God's laws. I felt it was an act of obedience." He put his son in a dirty bathtub on some towels and used a hunting knife, then called 911 when his son began bleeding profusely. His wife is pregnant with their 10th child. The boy recovered. Source: The Columbian, Dec. 8, 2004
Molester cites God. A man in Riverside, Calif., sentenced to 36 years to life for the repeated sexual abuse of his young stepdaughter, invoked God as his rationale. "God has a reason. Sometimes the things that happen in this life are so that we can learn from them," stated Miguel Angel Ordonez, 34. Ordonez was convicted of rape, forced oral copulation and repeated sexual abuse of the 12-year-old over a 7-year span. Source: Press-Enterprise, Jan. 8, 2005
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 6:14 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 2:34 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 60 of 181 (538455)
12-07-2009 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by iano
12-07-2009 6:59 AM


iano writes:
so I suppose him asking me to kill my family etc would be good too.
I seriously hope the police have you under surveillance. You are fucked in the head.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 6:59 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 2:36 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 63 of 181 (538466)
12-07-2009 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by greyseal
12-07-2009 10:48 AM


Re: do as I say, not as I do
When god does it, it's righteousness.
When man does it, it's murder and wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by greyseal, posted 12-07-2009 10:48 AM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by greyseal, posted 12-20-2009 11:54 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 66 of 181 (538495)
12-07-2009 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by iano
12-07-2009 2:36 PM


If you can't see how it is wrong that you said you would KILL YOUR FAMILY if god told you to, I say you are more far gone than I imagined. Seek help immediately.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 2:36 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 4:54 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 67 of 181 (538498)
12-07-2009 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by iano
12-07-2009 2:34 PM


All we've got is their say so that God told 'em to do what they did. Whether God did is another matter.
I myself suspect that God didn't tell them to do what they did.
Who are you to judge who god talks to and who he doesn't talk to? They are/were christian just like you.
Would you question if god spoke to moses? of course not. Just because these people aren't in the bible doesn't mean god didn't talk to them, does it? or is god silent nowadays?

Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 2:34 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 4:51 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 72 of 181 (538519)
12-07-2009 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by iano
12-07-2009 4:51 PM


I forgot: iano gets to determine who is a christian and who isn't. I guess being a pastor doesn't qualify being a christian (oops! spoiler alert because you didn't bother to read the link I posted).
I could ask the same question of you. You seemed to have judged He has in their case. Care to tell me how you figure that?
Well, they said that was their reason. Why would a christion use the almighty as an excuse? Are you saying SOME christians are dishonest in the name of god? I think you are the one who is dishonest. Mainly because, according to you, we really can't believe much anything christians say. Why believe anything in the bible? How do we know the writers were real christians?
I see you either aren't understanding the issue being presented to you, or you don't want to.

Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 4:51 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by iano, posted 12-07-2009 5:52 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024