Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 64 of 341 (615781)
05-16-2011 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Dr Adequate
05-16-2011 1:11 PM


Re: Fish Identification
... and the tail is floating above the shadow with no visible means for it to be in that position with that head, the head is not partially buried in the sand, so the balance is wrong
... and the seagulls have not pecked the eyes out
... and etc etc etc
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-16-2011 1:11 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 92 of 341 (632519)
09-08-2011 11:48 AM


Flat Earth
Panda writes:
Flat earth
I did a search in google for "how can we test if the earth is round" (as suggested by AdminChuck) and the first link provides several answers to Txomin's question.
quote:
Flat earth Txomin: I am interested in the simplest scientific experiment that a layman can carry out in order to determine rough measures regarding the Earth's shape and size. Think high-school education or less, if possible.
Hi Panda, Txomin
I did a google on "flat earth test" and also got many hits with examples, however some were from flat earthers showing how they "refuted" the tests and explained how the earth could be flat -- fascinating reading. I thought this site was the best:
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/flat/flateart.htm
quote:
3. The variation of the sun's elevation with latitude. (This was the basis of Eratosthenes' measurement.)
The Round Earth.
Eratosthenes (c 276 to 195 BCE) was probably the first to accurately measure the size of the Earth. He knew that at summer solstice the sun was directly overhead in Syene (now Aswan, Egypt). On that day, vertical sticks or poles cast no shadows, and sunlight fills the bottom of wells. The town of Alexandria is directly north of Syene (on the same meridian), and on that same day vertical poles do cast shadows, because the sun is then 7.2 from the zenith. Eratosthenes assumed this to be due to the earth's curvature.
Knowing the distance between these cities to be 5000 stadia (from land surveys), he calculated the earth's circumference to be 250,000 stadia. [1 stadium was 1/8 of a Roman mile, or 220 yards in modern measure.] That's a circumference of a little over 24,662 miles, which is nearly the modern value of 24,900 miles. ...
Note that Eratosthenes made the assumption that the sun was far enough way from the earth that the incoming solar rays are parallel.
...
Rethinking Eratosthenes.
One can reconstruct the origin of these numbers by doing a little geometry, starting from a flat earth hypothesis. Remember the experiment of Eratosthenes, who measured the angular elevation of the sun at two latitudes in Egypt? He assumed that the sun was effectively infinitely far away (or at least so far compared to the earth's size that the actual distance didn't matter). Then he calculated the diameter of the earth using a second assumption: that the earth was spherical.
But suppose you abandon Eratosthenes' two assumptions, and adopt instead the assumption that the earth is flat. Then, triangulation from the same data gives the distance to the sun: 3000 miles! See how a simple change of assumptions can drastically alter the entire cosmos? However, the round earth was more than an arbitary assumption for Eratosthenes, for he and his contemporaries, had other very good reasons for knowing the earth was round. [Textbooks sometimes mislead by suggesting that his experiment was designed to prove the earth was a sphere. It was not, it was only intended to measure the size of the sphere.]
Finally, the angular size of the sun is 0.5. Using this fact with a distance to the sun of 3000 miles, gives the sun's diameter: 32 miles. It therefore appears that the flat-earther's figures are based on sun elevation data at just two particular latitudes, perhaps even Eratosthenes' values. I speculate that flat earthers may have picked these out of some book, and when the calculation was finished, they looked no further. For if they had done the calculation with a variety of latitudes, including large latitude differences, conflicting results would have been obtained.
Still, one could save the hypothesis by assuming that light refracts in a peculiar way. Modern flat-earthers do indeed assume that refraction is at work. They attribute the disappearance of the ships over the horizon to a refraction effect, and even point out that with some atmospheric conditions, ships, icebergs, and distant mountains have been observed to rise above the horizon, and even turn upside down!
Turning upside down demonstrates that it is a mirage reflection. I have seen this phenomenon from the middle of Lake Michigan looking both east and west.
With modern equipment and watches we can now repeat Eratosthenes' experiment with observations made at the same time from different longitudes as well as different latitudes,
and establish a grid of measurements, each with their distance known from a set zero point that becomes the timer for the measurements when the sun is directly overhead.
Enlist a bunch of high schools from around the world to participate.
Then you could make a list of predictions from each hypothesis and test for them against the results
Could be a fun project.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Panda, posted 09-08-2011 12:48 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 97 by dwise1, posted 09-08-2011 4:10 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 114 by Txomin, posted 09-13-2011 3:56 AM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 96 of 341 (632563)
09-08-2011 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Butterflytyrant
09-08-2011 12:57 PM


Re: Flat Earth
Hi Butterflytyrant, Panda, etc.
It may be beyond your credibility but we should start teaching it in science classes just in case.
Your round earth theory is not the only option you know
Yes, we should teach both sides of the controversy and let the students decide ...
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Butterflytyrant, posted 09-08-2011 12:57 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 123 of 341 (633419)
09-14-2011 12:09 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by Dr Adequate
09-12-2011 8:10 PM


Re: Computer Help?
Hi Dr Adequate,
... I've never found any way to get internet access again except to restart my computer. There must be a better way, does anyone know of one?
Is this with wifi card in the computer or a hard wired modem connection? Is the wifi from your modem connection? Sometimes you just need to reboot the modem (I've had this problem with both cable and DSL wifi modems).
First left click the icon to see if that tells you the problem - has it lost ALL connections?
Second try "repair" as was suggested for windoze, or see if you can run a diagnostic.
The ipconfig was a common problem I had using available wifi systems and worked somethimes. It doesn't work for me with my MIFI air card -- I get a strong signal from the card but the card can be disconnected from the cell service (jez like a phone and I then need to turn the card off and then back on and then re-initiate the connection).
Third try just signing off and back on rather than rebooting.
Or get an Ipad . . . .
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-12-2011 8:10 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 126 of 341 (633549)
09-14-2011 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Txomin
09-13-2011 3:56 AM


Re: Flat Earth / curvature test
Hi Txomin, thanks, and welcome to the fray.
I was hoping for something that the average guy/adolescent could try out, a simplified/alternative experiment that would not require any form of sophisticated instrumentation. I don't know if such a method exists and my searches have come up empty.
One thing I was thinking about uses a boat and a lighthouse on a cliff, with the height of the cliff (lighthouse base) above sea level and the height of the lighthouse light above either sea level or the cliff (much of this information is usually provided on navigation charts because it can be used to determine how far away you are from the light.
Initially you can see both the top and the bottom of the lighthouse, and the base of the cliff. Measure the angles subtended by them, and simple geometry tells you how far away you are (assuming a right triangle portrays the geometry with sufficient accuracy, then you check that assumption by assuming it is an isosceles triangle and comparing the calculated results -- each assumption should give you min\max limits to the actual distance, also check it with a gps).
Now move away until an observer at the top of a tall mast of known height above sea level sees the base of the cliff is almost obscured by the apparent curve of the water. Draw yourself a picture of that and the lines of sight.
You can measure the angle of the lighthouse from top to base and calculate your distance from the lighthouse. And you can check that by also using the full height from the base of the cliff to the top of the lighthouse. Concordance between distances eliminates refraction as it would affect the one to the base of the cliff more. Your line of sight to the base of the cliff is also your line of sight tangent to the surface of the sea that almost obscures the base, and from this you can calculate the curvature of the water\earth.
Draw it out to see how it works.
Enjoy.

... as you are new here, some posting tips:
type [qs]quotes are easy[/qs] and it becomes:
quotes are easy
or type [quote]quotes are easy[/quote] and it becomes:
quote:
quotes are easy
also check out (help) links on any formatting questions when in the reply window.
For other formatting tips see Posting Tips
For a quick overview see EvC Forum Primer
If you have problems with replies see Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
If you use the message reply buttons (there's one at the bottom right of each message):
... your message is linked to the one you are replying to (adds clarity). You can also look at the way a post is formatted with the "peek" button next to it.
Edited by RAZD, : tips

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Txomin, posted 09-13-2011 3:56 AM Txomin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2011 6:16 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 129 of 341 (633595)
09-14-2011 11:11 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by crashfrog
09-14-2011 6:16 PM


Re: Flat Earth / curvature test -- laser light shows
Hi crashfrog
Yeah, I was thinking of using lasers ...
If you set two plumb bobs a substantial distance apart - say, opposite ends of a very long bridge - and then use a telescope from a vantage point where you can see both, you'll see that they aren't parallel.
It's a convenient experiment for those of us who are landlocked.
That would certainly solve the problem of refraction.
Have you calculated how far apart they would need to be to measure the difference?
You could use lasers to send two or three beams of light straight up from a good distance apart and see the same effect, with three lasers you could get confirmation in the results.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2011 6:16 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by crashfrog, posted 09-15-2011 10:51 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 165 of 341 (648439)
01-15-2012 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by Butterflytyrant
01-15-2012 4:59 PM


Re: the flood
Hi Butterflytyrant,
In your opinion, what would be the top 3 to 5 arguments to put on the table to support the position that the flood of Noah is impossible?
Seashells on mountain tops.
This may seem counter intuitive, but there are several basic problems with seashells on mountaintops that show it was not a world wide flood event:
  • The sediment where the seashells are found have evidence of mature marine ecosystems that would need decades to produce, more than could possibly occur during a couple hundred days with normal growth behavior;
  • There are multiple layers of such deposits, not a single event, and different layers have
    different organisms that show evolution from one layer to the next;
  • floods do not produce mountains, plate tectonics does, with current recorded movement consistent with the long development of mountains;
  • floods pile debris in low spots, all jumbled up, not sorted on mountain tops;
  • different mountains have different ages, and the marine growth on them come from different eras of evolution of life on earth, consistent with the mountain ages;
  • there is not one thing I am aware of that is consistent with a world wide flood lasting a couple hundred days at most.
These problems cannot be resolved without invoking magic and made up scenarios that are just ad hoc inventions with no empirical basis.
But if I want to argue that the YEC worldview is false I would start with the age of the earth, as laid out in Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1.
The evidence shows again and again that the earth is old, very old, 4.55 billion years old.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Butterflytyrant, posted 01-15-2012 4:59 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by foreveryoung, posted 03-19-2012 1:25 AM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 251 of 341 (656527)
03-19-2012 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by foreveryoung
03-19-2012 1:25 AM


Re: the flood vs creation?
Hi foreveryoung,
Others have replied to this, but I would like to go into a little more detail.
Wasn't the earth covered with water at the beginning of the archean?
It wasn't covered completely, although the current thought is that large shallow seas covered more of the globe than we see today. In addition the land mass may not have developed into continents until the end of the Archean.
The Archean Eon and the Hadean
quote:
Because collisions between large planetesimals release a lot of heat, the Earth and other planets would have been molten at the beginning of their histories. Solidification of the molten material into rock happened as the Earth cooled. The oldest meteorites and lunar rocks are about 4.5 billion years old, but the oldest Earth rocks currently known are 3.8 billion years. Sometime during the first 800 million or so years of its history, the surface of the Earth changed from liquid to solid. Once solid rock formed on the Earth, its geological history began. This most likely happened prior to 3.8 billion years, but hard evidence for this is lacking. Erosion and plate tectonics has probably destroyed all of the solid rocks that were older than 3.8 billion years. The advent of a rock record roughly marks the beginning of the Archean eon.
The molten surface cooled, volcanoes were common, and they released water vapor that then fell down to form the seas.
Archean Eon | Atmosphere, Timeline, and Facts | Britannica
quote:
The Archean eon, which preceded the Phanerozoic eon, spanned about 1.5 billion years and is subdivided into four eras: the Neoarchean (2.8 to 2.5 billion years ago), Mesoarchean (3.2 to 2.8 billion years ago), Paleoarchean (3.6 to 3.2 billion years ago), and Eoarchean (4 to 3.6 billion years ago).*
If you were able to travel back to visit the Earth during the Archean, you would likely not recognize it as the same planet we inhabit today. The atmosphere was very different from what we breathe today; at that time, it was likely a reducing atmosphere of methane, ammonia, and other gases which would be toxic to most life on our planet today. Also during this time, the Earth's crust cooled enough that rocks and continental plates began to form.
It was early in the Archean that life first appeared on Earth. Our oldest fossils date to roughly 3.5 billion years ago, and consist of bacteria microfossils. In fact, all life during the more than one billion years of the Archean was bacterial. ...
The earliest terrestrial materials are not rocks but minerals. In Western Australia some sedimentary conglomerates, dated to 3.3 billion years ago, contain relict detrital zircon grains that have isotopic ages between 4.2 and 4.4 billion years. These grains must have been transported by rivers ...
Archean oceans were likely created by the condensation of water derived from the outgassing of abundant volcanoes. ...
Throughout the Archean, oceanic and island arc crust was produced semi-continuously for 1.5 billion years; ...
... Other rocks that occur in granulite-gneiss belts (zones of rocks that were metamorphosed in the Archean mid-lower crust) are exhumed remnants of the lower parts of the Archean continents and thus preserve evidence of deep crustal processes operating at the time.
We have continent formation with rivers, so there were areas that were not flooded.
That qualifies as a flood to me.
There is no record of life before the Archean eon, there was no wood to build an ark with, no people to build the ark and no animals to put in the ark.
It seems to me that a better (yet still imperfect) match is with chapter 1 of genesis:
quote:
1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
1:10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
I also note that a separation of land and water is a common motif in religions.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by foreveryoung, posted 03-19-2012 1:25 AM foreveryoung has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 252 of 341 (656699)
03-21-2012 9:35 AM


regarding CrytoGod thread Is evolution based on empirical science?
CrytoGod asks Is evolution based on empirical science?
The short answer is yes.
All science is empirical. It is based on the scientific method. Evolution is based on the scientific method, and many empirical tests and observations have been made: evolution is science.
(1) The process of evolution involves the change in the frequency distribution and composition of hereditary traits within breeding populations from generation to generation, in response to ecological challenges and opportunities.
Mutations of hereditary traits have been observed to occur, and thus this aspect of evolution is an observed, known objective fact, rather than an untested hypothesis.
Natural selection and neutral drift have been observed to occur, along with the observed alteration in the distribution of hereditary traits within breeding populations, and thus this aspect of evolution is an observed, known objective fact, and not an untested hypothesis.
Studying these processes via the scientific method is what the science of evolution does.
The rest of his post is argument from incredulity and ignorance, common to creationist misunderstanding of the evidence, the science and the theory of evolution, and which will be shredded by many people once this post is promoted.
Nobody has seen a mountain form by plate tectonics, and the reason is simple: people don't live long enough.
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : subtitle

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Theodoric, posted 03-21-2012 10:09 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 254 by dwise1, posted 03-21-2012 3:46 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 256 of 341 (656758)
03-21-2012 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by dwise1
03-21-2012 3:46 PM


Re: regarding CrytoGod thread Is evolution based on empirical science?
Hi dwise1,
Somebody needs to point him to the recent discussion of cladistics so that he can understand why his "but they're still fruitflies!" complaint is so incredibly lame.
Indeed.
And also mention that evolution is observed in every generation of every species.
But the likely problem will be hat because he doesn't understand evolution that he won't know even when he is told.
Cognitive dissonance is like that.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by dwise1, posted 03-21-2012 3:46 PM dwise1 has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 257 of 341 (656943)
03-23-2012 12:34 PM


is IQ165+ real or a joke?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sophiq/
quote:
Admission to this group is based upon convincing evidence of an IQ "somewhere around 165" (or higher)! High verbal ability is particularly cherished, as is an insatiable, inimitable, impractical sense of bad humor!
Is this our latest poster?
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by Panda, posted 03-23-2012 1:04 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 259 by Dr Adequate, posted 03-23-2012 2:36 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 260 by xongsmith, posted 03-23-2012 2:39 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 270 of 341 (657031)
03-24-2012 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by hooah212002
03-24-2012 4:24 PM


Ubuntu!!!!!
hi hooah22002
I'm just going to aquire an English version.
Why?
You could try Ubuntu 10 for free.
Enjoyh

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by hooah212002, posted 03-24-2012 4:24 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 271 by crashfrog, posted 03-25-2012 10:58 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 281 by hooah212002, posted 03-28-2012 8:23 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 280 of 341 (657106)
03-25-2012 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by Coragyps
03-25-2012 8:06 PM


depends on whether or not he shoots them ...

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by Coragyps, posted 03-25-2012 8:06 PM Coragyps has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024