Do you think SETI is it's own scientific classification? you seem to be putting SETI (research institute) in the same category as Biology, Chemistry, Astronomy etc. SETI is a group that hopes to find life in the cosmos. You, too, can download and install SETI on your home PC in order to help in the effort.
What are you two on about with SETI? What is your gripe with it? Are you afraid we just might not be alone? Will that make us not-so-special?
Can you show (with links) some information on just who the SETI institute provided its findings to, what research has been conducted, what findings have been found, who the group of peers were who accepted it,
Did you bother looking? Here is a start:
Peer Reviewed Journal Publications
and Other Recent Articles on The Society for Planetary SETI Researchp
who accepted their work for publication in science textbooks?
First, show me a science textbook that "teaches" SETI. Again, you astoundedly have no clue as to what SETI is, apparently.
Today’s scientific community does not seek to prove Darwinism wrong.
That's because "Darwinism" is a buzz word for creo-tards. You will not find anyone trying to prove "Newtonism" wrong either, or "Einsteinism".
"Some people think God is an outsized, light-skinned male with a long white beard, sitting on a throne somewhere up there in the sky, busily tallying the fall of every sparrow. Othersfor example Baruch Spinoza and Albert Einsteinconsidered God to be essentially the sum total of the physical laws which describe the universe. I do not know of any compelling evidence for anthropomorphic patriarchs controlling human destiny from some hidden celestial vantage point, but it would be madness to deny the existence of physical laws."-Carl Sagan
"On a personal note I think he's the greatest wrestler ever. He's better than Lou Thesz, Gorgeous George -- you name it."-The Hulkster on Nature Boy Ric Flair