Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why creationist definitions of evolution are wrong, terribly wrong.
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3694 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 85 of 205 (546821)
02-14-2010 1:03 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Coyote
02-06-2010 12:04 AM


Re: why use a wrong definition?
This is off-topic. Please, no replies to this message in this thread. --Admin
Which universe is this forum discussing - a finite or infinite one? There are only two options here, and whichever one settles on - everything they say thereafter must allign with their preamble.
I ask because apples and oranges apply with each selected preamble. Usually, this question becomes corrupted with a runaway pseudo qualification of limited and conditional versions of finite.
So to prempt: What applies with a non-conditional and absolute definition of which ever preamble is selected? This says that in a finite uni, at one time there was no:
TIME
SPACE
MATTER
ENERGY
FORCES
QUARKS
LIGHT
DARKNESS
HEAT/COLD
CONTRACTIONS/EXPANSIONS.
PARALLEL UNI's
In fact, in order to learn, I would request those who do not accept a finite universe, to please play devil's advocate: what applies if the uni is accepted as totally and absolutely 'FINITE'? I ask this because devil's advocate debate is a legitimate eye opener and a most scientific mode of arriving at the most correct premise. Have a go!
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
Edited by Admin, : Add note at top.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Coyote, posted 02-06-2010 12:04 AM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Coyote, posted 02-14-2010 1:09 AM IamJoseph has replied
 Message 89 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-14-2010 1:47 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3694 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 87 of 205 (546823)
02-14-2010 1:15 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by Coyote
02-14-2010 1:09 AM


Re: why use a wrong definition?
Which part is not scientific?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Coyote, posted 02-14-2010 1:09 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024