A network of chemical reactions that can incrementally increase in complexity until it is as complex as life falls in the same naturalistic realm as does spontaneous generation
I'm not sure whether it is stupidity or dishonesty that gave rise to this bizarre conflation, but either way it is way beyond my ability to measure
especially since spontaneous generation is referred to in today's abiogenesis studies! We saw it in message 107;
In 1953, Stanley Miller and Harold Urey demonstrated that many simple biomolecules could be formed spontaneously.....
Did you seriously just claim that a generic use of the word "spontaneously" was actually a reference to the specific "Spontaneous Generation"???
Really? You can do that with a straight face, and claim that you are not being an idiot?
Hopefully you now understand that your terms are incorrect... ...Why should we separate abiogenesis from spontaneity? It's all naturalism!
No, what we understand is what we've always understood... that people such as yourself have either too much dishonesty or too little knowledge to be worth anything more than a target for ridicule.