Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,416 Year: 3,673/9,624 Month: 544/974 Week: 157/276 Day: 31/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The End of Evolution By Means of Natural Selection
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 570 of 851 (557277)
04-24-2010 6:42 AM
Reply to: Message 569 by Faith
04-24-2010 4:47 AM


Re: Only one mutation per individual
You say
Only one mutation per individual
Yet you quote
on average each new human being possesses one new allele through mutation
So, let’s use 0.6-per-individual as the rate of new alleles in the population
One new allele per individual at birth?
And you conclude
So yes, I got it from this discussion.
Please please say you've now spotted the obvious error...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 569 by Faith, posted 04-24-2010 4:47 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 571 by Percy, posted 04-24-2010 7:28 AM cavediver has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 572 of 851 (557281)
04-24-2010 8:01 AM
Reply to: Message 571 by Percy
04-24-2010 7:28 AM


Re: Only one mutation per individual
Faith is correct that she got the figure of one new allele per individual
No, Faith somehow got the figure of one new MUTATION per individual, as per the subtitle above...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 571 by Percy, posted 04-24-2010 7:28 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 574 by Percy, posted 04-24-2010 8:23 AM cavediver has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 575 of 851 (557302)
04-24-2010 12:33 PM
Reply to: Message 574 by Percy
04-24-2010 8:23 AM


Re: Only one mutation per individual
What she meant but expressed poorly with "what mutations do" is cause one new allele per individual
Perhaps, but given the following...
Faith writes:
Answering your assertion that I was wrong about 1 mutation and that I got it from this discussion...
I get the distinct impression that "mutation" and "allele" are being substantially confused... or is that really not news for this thread?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 574 by Percy, posted 04-24-2010 8:23 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 576 by Percy, posted 04-24-2010 1:03 PM cavediver has not replied
 Message 577 by Faith, posted 04-24-2010 1:30 PM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024