Regardless, their is a growing number of dissenters who are actually considering the Pre-Clovis theory.
First of all what do you mean by pre-clovis. I think there are a lot of people that do not subscribethat the first peoples in america were clovis. I think even using the term like that may be bad form. I am not sure but I do not think it is highly disputed that there were humans in america pre-clovis. Maybe Coyote can fill us in on this. But because there may be a pre-clovis influx does not mean that the Solutrean idea is valid.
Also, I stand by my comments that the only thing backing the Solutrean Hypothesis is similarity of tools. You stated there is a growing body of evidence, but have not shown any. Is there a growing body of evidence? If so I do not see it. Please share.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts