You like to liberally sprinkle your opinions with appeals to science words such as "empirical evidence" but you have yet to demonstrate what is empirical about your claims and evidence is a matter of interpretation.
Seeing as you are much more an evangelist for evolution rather than a scientist, I am not surprised. What I want to know is why you get a pass on it here.
To say it didn't happen on a certain date, that's easy just pick a date and go with it. You might even sidle up with Biblical scholars because its convenient for you, although you reject everything else they have to say as worthless.
To say it didnt happen at all, that's a whole nuther matter, so you avoid that one like the plague.
You are not doing science, you are simply a fellow using his credentials on a personal crusade against the Bible.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
