|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The UK Election!!!! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Good stuff and welcome to our little experiment.
To keep things simple in terms of seperating the issues with which to test Legend's methodology and your reasons for your choices do you mind if I translate your proposed issues into something like the following:
Feel free to suggest alternative wording. Or we can just add your issues with your original wording if you prefer.
The gap between rich and poor has grown under "Labour" and that is shameful. This is their greatest failing of the last 13 years IMHO.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 3.8 |
To keep things simple in terms of seperating the issues with which to test Legend's methodology and your reasons for your choices do you mind if I translate your proposed issues into something like the following: Fine by me.
This is their greatest failing of the last 13 years IMHO. Yeah. The problem I think is that Labour managed to trap themselves in a prison of their own making. They made themselves electable, but at the cost of their ambitions. They became terrified of any kind of bold action or challenge to the status quo. They were so afraid of losing the middle class vote that they simply sat on their hands. I think that if there is to be any point to a Labour government, they need to be more ambitious in their next administration, whenever that might be. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
They made themselves electable, but at the cost of their ambitions. A massive missed opportunity. I think many considered them such an attractively electable proposition back in 1997 because of what they thought they could and would do. And the unelectability of the tories throughout most of the last 13 years makes such timidity completely unjustifiable even in a strictly practical electioneering sense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Getting there.
7 participants now and the following issues suggested:
We still need a few more participants if possible. So anyone else? Immigration? Trident? Childcare? Science research funding? Anyone consider any of these or anything else as yet unmentioned to be the burning issues of the day? Speak now or forever hold your ballor paper!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8527 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
If you do not receive the required number of Her Majesty's Subjects to respond I offer the following:
1. Hold a Constitutional Convention and plebiscite adopting a formal Supreme Constitution of the land. 2. Dissolve the monarchy. 3. Join the Euro.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Fine by me. We can throw your suggestions into the pot. A written constitution and doing away with the monarchy are things I would certainly support. So that is 8 participants now and a decent range of issues. Any more? Final call to UK members.
Legend - How are you envisaging that this list is reduced down to the two issues that actually get voted on? How would this work in your 40 million plus participants direct democracy setup? Here is the list of issues again:
Once Legend has told us how we are to select the two primary issues from this list we can do that. Then we need to somehow agree the wording of questions on which to vote. The experiment continues...........
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Legend Member (Idle past 5027 days) Posts: 1226 From: Wales, UK Joined: |
First we find the two issues that were voted the most. OFTOMH I'd say these were:
--Voting reform--Free education Now we need an alloted administrator to take this forward. I'm prepared to take up this role, if there are no objections. "Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
I object! This administrator is obviously biased! He didn't pick my "Kick out the towelheads!" proposal! It's clear he's a liberal communist who will destroy our country by wording the bills in such a way that honest Englishmen will be royally screwed, and the cameljockeys will get all the money again. and even their own party with this stupid "voting reform" (Yeah right, Dhimmy bend over take us from behind and introduce sharia law, that's what it is!)! I will not stand for it!
It's clear that everybody is just afraid of the sandniggers to vote for my proposal, everybody agrees with it! they must! they're honest and true Englishmen like me! Quit being Dhimmy fags and join me for a better and brighter (heh, that rimes with whiter... wait, I'm not supposed to say that) Britain!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
I foresee a rich future ahead of you as a journalist at the Daily Mail.
TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Joking and obstinacy apart I genuinely thought the two issues (out of theose raised) that received most support were:
Now we need an alloted administrator to take this forward. I'm prepared to take up this role, if there are no objections. I have no objection to that in principle. But I do object to your choice of the two main issues. "free education" seemed something of a one-off mention compared to other issues which were raised multiple times in different ways.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8527 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
So is that what direct democracy is? A couple of self-appointed liberals who think they know what's best decide the issues to bring forward?
What happened to discussion? Who voted on having these two issues come forward from the list? Did I miss the official vote? Was it ever announced that we would vote on which two issues to bring out from the list? Was there even any intention of having us, the public, vote on which issues to bring forward? What rules for voting have been established? Since there are two issues to bring out do we each get 2 votes? If none achieve a majority then what? Do the two of you just take it upon yourselves to decide? What kind of direct democracy are we practicing here? The directed dictated kind? I strongly object! New Issues: How do we decide which issues to bring from the list?What voting method is to be used?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
I agree with AZPaul3! What makes you think you can dictate to us what the wordings of the bill are! I demand a vote on every single word. This is a direct democracy afterall, not a "We tell you what to vote on, and will word it in such a way that the towelheads will always win"ocracy!
I say votes on the wording of the bill!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
So is that what direct democracy is? A couple of self-appointed liberals who think they know what's best decide the issues to bring forward? Apparently so. Although this is one of the few occasions that Legend has been described as "liberal".
Did I miss the official vote? Was it ever announced that we would vote on which two issues to bring out from the list? Was there even any intention of having us, the public, vote on which issues to bring forward? What do you think this is? A friggin democracy? Oh........
What rules for voting have been established? Since there are two issues to bring out do we each get 2 votes? If none achieve a majority then what? I dunno.
Do the two of you just take it upon yourselves to decide? Well that was kinda the plan.
What kind of direct democracy are we practicing here? The directed dictated kind? I am denying all responsibility. It was Legend's idea. This is all his fault. Wasn't me guv.
I strongly object! We woulda got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids!!
New Issues: How do we decide which issues to bring from the list?What voting method is to be used? Do we get to vote on that........?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
HELP!!
The foreigners are revolting!!!
I say votes on the wording of the bill! Whooah! Hold your horses there. We need to decide which two issues we are going to word a bill on first. Apparently myself and Legend just interpreting the messages so far received isn't considered good enough. So what do we do instead?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Straggler writes:
Well, let's anounce an official "voting round"... oh wait, we'd have to vote on if we're going to have a voting round, right? Should we vote on whether or not to have a voting round to determine whether or not to have a voting round? Oh dear, I see infinite regress and a terminal flaw in the system! Whooah! Hold your horses there. We need to decide which two issues we are going to word a bill on first. Look, let's just kick out the towelheads, all problems will resolve themselves then.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024