Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The UK Election!!!!
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 316 of 427 (560581)
05-16-2010 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 315 by Granny Magda
05-16-2010 8:52 AM


Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
Good stuff and welcome to our little experiment.
To keep things simple in terms of seperating the issues with which to test Legend's methodology and your reasons for your choices do you mind if I translate your proposed issues into something like the following:
  • Voting reform - Parliament should better represent the number of votes each party receives
  • Tax reform - With the aim of reducing the gap between the richest and the poorest.
    Feel free to suggest alternative wording. Or we can just add your issues with your original wording if you prefer.
    The gap between rich and poor has grown under "Labour" and that is shameful.
    This is their greatest failing of the last 13 years IMHO.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 315 by Granny Magda, posted 05-16-2010 8:52 AM Granny Magda has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 317 by Granny Magda, posted 05-16-2010 9:30 AM Straggler has replied

      
    Granny Magda
    Member
    Posts: 2462
    From: UK
    Joined: 11-12-2007
    Member Rating: 3.8


    Message 317 of 427 (560586)
    05-16-2010 9:30 AM
    Reply to: Message 316 by Straggler
    05-16-2010 9:05 AM


    Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
    To keep things simple in terms of seperating the issues with which to test Legend's methodology and your reasons for your choices do you mind if I translate your proposed issues into something like the following:
    Fine by me.
    This is their greatest failing of the last 13 years IMHO.
    Yeah. The problem I think is that Labour managed to trap themselves in a prison of their own making. They made themselves electable, but at the cost of their ambitions. They became terrified of any kind of bold action or challenge to the status quo. They were so afraid of losing the middle class vote that they simply sat on their hands. I think that if there is to be any point to a Labour government, they need to be more ambitious in their next administration, whenever that might be.
    Mutate and Survive

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 316 by Straggler, posted 05-16-2010 9:05 AM Straggler has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 318 by Straggler, posted 05-16-2010 9:44 AM Granny Magda has not replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 318 of 427 (560589)
    05-16-2010 9:44 AM
    Reply to: Message 317 by Granny Magda
    05-16-2010 9:30 AM


    Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
    They made themselves electable, but at the cost of their ambitions.
    A massive missed opportunity. I think many considered them such an attractively electable proposition back in 1997 because of what they thought they could and would do. And the unelectability of the tories throughout most of the last 13 years makes such timidity completely unjustifiable even in a strictly practical electioneering sense.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 317 by Granny Magda, posted 05-16-2010 9:30 AM Granny Magda has not replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 319 of 427 (560592)
    05-16-2010 9:50 AM
    Reply to: Message 314 by Straggler
    05-15-2010 6:45 PM


    Re: VOTE NOW - Calling All UK Members
    Getting there.
    7 participants now and the following issues suggested:
  • Voting reform
  • Deficit reduction
  • Troop withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Get safely and stably out of recession with a long term view to economic stability.
  • Solve the elderly crisis (there are more and more of them, and it looks to continue to rise).
  • Less taxes!
  • Kick out the towelheads/cameljockeys/sandniggers!
  • Free education!
  • Financial reform (break up the banks so they have to stand on their own two feet).
  • Overhauling the nhs to reduce bureaucracy
  • Voting reform - Parliament should better represent the number of votes each party receives
  • Tax reform - With the aim of reducing the gap between the richest and the poorest.
    We still need a few more participants if possible. So anyone else?
    Immigration? Trident? Childcare? Science research funding? Anyone consider any of these or anything else as yet unmentioned to be the burning issues of the day? Speak now or forever hold your ballor paper!!!

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 314 by Straggler, posted 05-15-2010 6:45 PM Straggler has not replied

      
    AZPaul3
    Member
    Posts: 8527
    From: Phoenix
    Joined: 11-06-2006
    Member Rating: 5.2


    Message 320 of 427 (560752)
    05-17-2010 12:05 PM


    A Foreign Influence
    If you do not receive the required number of Her Majesty's Subjects to respond I offer the following:
    1. Hold a Constitutional Convention and plebiscite adopting a formal Supreme Constitution of the land.
    2. Dissolve the monarchy.
    3. Join the Euro.

    Replies to this message:
     Message 321 by Straggler, posted 05-17-2010 12:37 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 321 of 427 (560757)
    05-17-2010 12:37 PM
    Reply to: Message 320 by AZPaul3
    05-17-2010 12:05 PM


    Final Call To UK Members
    Fine by me. We can throw your suggestions into the pot. A written constitution and doing away with the monarchy are things I would certainly support. So that is 8 participants now and a decent range of issues. Any more? Final call to UK members.
    Legend - How are you envisaging that this list is reduced down to the two issues that actually get voted on? How would this work in your 40 million plus participants direct democracy setup?
    Here is the list of issues again:
  • Voting reform
  • Deficit reduction
  • Troop withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Get safely and stably out of recession with a long term view to economic stability.
  • Solve the elderly crisis (there are more and more of them, and it looks to continue to rise).
  • Less taxes!
  • Kick out the towelheads/cameljockeys/sandniggers!
  • Free education!
  • Financial reform (break up the banks so they have to stand on their own two feet).
  • Overhauling the nhs to reduce bureaucracy
  • Voting reform - Parliament should better represent the number of votes each party receives
  • Tax reform - With the aim of reducing the gap between the richest and the poorest.
  • Hold a Constitutional Convention and plebiscite adopting a formal Supreme Constitution of the land.
  • Dissolve the monarchy.
  • Join the Euro.
    Once Legend has told us how we are to select the two primary issues from this list we can do that. Then we need to somehow agree the wording of questions on which to vote.
    The experiment continues...........

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 320 by AZPaul3, posted 05-17-2010 12:05 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 322 by Legend, posted 05-19-2010 4:21 PM Straggler has replied

      
    Legend
    Member (Idle past 5027 days)
    Posts: 1226
    From: Wales, UK
    Joined: 05-07-2004


    Message 322 of 427 (561260)
    05-19-2010 4:21 PM
    Reply to: Message 321 by Straggler
    05-17-2010 12:37 PM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    First we find the two issues that were voted the most. OFTOMH I'd say these were:
    --Voting reform
    --Free education
    Now we need an alloted administrator to take this forward. I'm prepared to take up this role, if there are no objections.

    "Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred."

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 321 by Straggler, posted 05-17-2010 12:37 PM Straggler has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 323 by Huntard, posted 05-19-2010 5:26 PM Legend has not replied
     Message 325 by Straggler, posted 05-19-2010 7:16 PM Legend has not replied

      
    Huntard
    Member (Idle past 2316 days)
    Posts: 2870
    From: Limburg, The Netherlands
    Joined: 09-02-2008


    Message 323 of 427 (561269)
    05-19-2010 5:26 PM
    Reply to: Message 322 by Legend
    05-19-2010 4:21 PM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    I object! This administrator is obviously biased! He didn't pick my "Kick out the towelheads!" proposal! It's clear he's a liberal communist who will destroy our country by wording the bills in such a way that honest Englishmen will be royally screwed, and the cameljockeys will get all the money again. and even their own party with this stupid "voting reform" (Yeah right, Dhimmy bend over take us from behind and introduce sharia law, that's what it is!)! I will not stand for it!
    It's clear that everybody is just afraid of the sandniggers to vote for my proposal, everybody agrees with it! they must! they're honest and true Englishmen like me!
    Quit being Dhimmy fags and join me for a better and brighter (heh, that rimes with whiter... wait, I'm not supposed to say that) Britain!

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 322 by Legend, posted 05-19-2010 4:21 PM Legend has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 324 by Wounded King, posted 05-19-2010 5:41 PM Huntard has not replied

      
    Wounded King
    Member
    Posts: 4149
    From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Joined: 04-09-2003


    Message 324 of 427 (561271)
    05-19-2010 5:41 PM
    Reply to: Message 323 by Huntard
    05-19-2010 5:26 PM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    I foresee a rich future ahead of you as a journalist at the Daily Mail.
    TTFN,
    WK

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 323 by Huntard, posted 05-19-2010 5:26 PM Huntard has not replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 325 of 427 (561288)
    05-19-2010 7:16 PM
    Reply to: Message 322 by Legend
    05-19-2010 4:21 PM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    Joking and obstinacy apart I genuinely thought the two issues (out of theose raised) that received most support were:
  • Voting reform
  • Defecit reduction
    Now we need an alloted administrator to take this forward. I'm prepared to take up this role, if there are no objections.
    I have no objection to that in principle. But I do object to your choice of the two main issues. "free education" seemed something of a one-off mention compared to other issues which were raised multiple times in different ways.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 322 by Legend, posted 05-19-2010 4:21 PM Legend has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 326 by AZPaul3, posted 05-20-2010 2:20 AM Straggler has replied
     Message 327 by Huntard, posted 05-20-2010 2:57 AM Straggler has replied

      
    AZPaul3
    Member
    Posts: 8527
    From: Phoenix
    Joined: 11-06-2006
    Member Rating: 5.2


    Message 326 of 427 (561356)
    05-20-2010 2:20 AM
    Reply to: Message 325 by Straggler
    05-19-2010 7:16 PM


    A Call To Arms!
    So is that what direct democracy is? A couple of self-appointed liberals who think they know what's best decide the issues to bring forward?
    What happened to discussion? Who voted on having these two issues come forward from the list?
    Did I miss the official vote? Was it ever announced that we would vote on which two issues to bring out from the list? Was there even any intention of having us, the public, vote on which issues to bring forward?
    What rules for voting have been established? Since there are two issues to bring out do we each get 2 votes? If none achieve a majority then what?
    Do the two of you just take it upon yourselves to decide?
    What kind of direct democracy are we practicing here? The directed dictated kind?
    I strongly object!
    New Issues:
    How do we decide which issues to bring from the list?
    What voting method is to be used?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 325 by Straggler, posted 05-19-2010 7:16 PM Straggler has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 328 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:30 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

      
    Huntard
    Member (Idle past 2316 days)
    Posts: 2870
    From: Limburg, The Netherlands
    Joined: 09-02-2008


    Message 327 of 427 (561358)
    05-20-2010 2:57 AM
    Reply to: Message 325 by Straggler
    05-19-2010 7:16 PM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    I agree with AZPaul3! What makes you think you can dictate to us what the wordings of the bill are! I demand a vote on every single word. This is a direct democracy afterall, not a "We tell you what to vote on, and will word it in such a way that the towelheads will always win"ocracy!
    I say votes on the wording of the bill!

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 325 by Straggler, posted 05-19-2010 7:16 PM Straggler has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 329 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:33 AM Huntard has replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 328 of 427 (561365)
    05-20-2010 4:30 AM
    Reply to: Message 326 by AZPaul3
    05-20-2010 2:20 AM


    Re: A Call To Arms!
    So is that what direct democracy is? A couple of self-appointed liberals who think they know what's best decide the issues to bring forward?
    Apparently so. Although this is one of the few occasions that Legend has been described as "liberal".
    Did I miss the official vote? Was it ever announced that we would vote on which two issues to bring out from the list? Was there even any intention of having us, the public, vote on which issues to bring forward?
    What do you think this is? A friggin democracy? Oh........
    What rules for voting have been established? Since there are two issues to bring out do we each get 2 votes? If none achieve a majority then what?
    I dunno.
    Do the two of you just take it upon yourselves to decide?
    Well that was kinda the plan.
    What kind of direct democracy are we practicing here? The directed dictated kind?
    I am denying all responsibility. It was Legend's idea. This is all his fault. Wasn't me guv.
    I strongly object!
    We woulda got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids!!
    New Issues:
    How do we decide which issues to bring from the list?
    What voting method is to be used?
    Do we get to vote on that........?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 326 by AZPaul3, posted 05-20-2010 2:20 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

      
    Straggler
    Member
    Posts: 10333
    From: London England
    Joined: 09-30-2006


    Message 329 of 427 (561366)
    05-20-2010 4:33 AM
    Reply to: Message 327 by Huntard
    05-20-2010 2:57 AM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    HELP!!
    The foreigners are revolting!!!
    I say votes on the wording of the bill!
    Whooah! Hold your horses there. We need to decide which two issues we are going to word a bill on first.
    Apparently myself and Legend just interpreting the messages so far received isn't considered good enough. So what do we do instead?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 327 by Huntard, posted 05-20-2010 2:57 AM Huntard has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 330 by Huntard, posted 05-20-2010 4:45 AM Straggler has replied

      
    Huntard
    Member (Idle past 2316 days)
    Posts: 2870
    From: Limburg, The Netherlands
    Joined: 09-02-2008


    Message 330 of 427 (561367)
    05-20-2010 4:45 AM
    Reply to: Message 329 by Straggler
    05-20-2010 4:33 AM


    Re: Final Call To UK Members
    Straggler writes:
    Whooah! Hold your horses there. We need to decide which two issues we are going to word a bill on first.
    Well, let's anounce an official "voting round"... oh wait, we'd have to vote on if we're going to have a voting round, right? Should we vote on whether or not to have a voting round to determine whether or not to have a voting round? Oh dear, I see infinite regress and a terminal flaw in the system!
    Look, let's just kick out the towelheads, all problems will resolve themselves then.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 329 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:33 AM Straggler has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 331 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:54 AM Huntard has replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024