Easy proof for Inteligent Design

Is this a joke? No, seriously, is this a joke?The laws of physics don't actually exist. Neither are the laws in logic. These are just human conventions to impose/superimpose a pattern onto what we observe in reality.So, seriously, are you joking or are you like 12 years old? If you had taken any science class or any logic class at all in college, you would have known that the laws of physics and the laws of logic don't actually exist in the real world and that they are just human conventions.Everything else is non-sense. Even if your premises are true, your logical conclusion makes absolutely no sense.Your so-called logical proof is no better than the one used by early religionists.The greatest being in the universe must exist.God is the greatest being in the universe.God must exist.If you can't see the obvious flaw in that line of logic, then I suppose your sorry of an excuse for a logical proof makes sense to you after all.

This is the typical creationist attitude that I have seen over the years. You come here expecting someone to tell you a whole lifetime's worth of scientific and philosophy study in a paragraph or so.I'm sorry for sounding condescending and downright mean, but your attempt at using the words "logic", "science", "physics," and other academic concepts are failing miserably. You toss those words around as if you know anything about the topics they describe. You don't.I see that other people may have the patience to answer your questions. They can continue entertaining you if they want. But my advice to you is to sign up for some classes at your local college for god's sake. I don't think my eyes have rolled this far up before.

Better that they see it from me on an anonymous online forum than embarrassing themselves in a public meeting. I have absolutely no respect for people who wants society to revert back to the dark ages. You know, the same kind that last year in my town meeting stood up in front of everyone and proclaimed that "homosexuality causes teenage pregnancy." You know, the same kind that applauded his claim. If the premises are true, it doesn't necessarily lead to a logical, or even sane, conclusion. His logical progression makes absolutely no sense. I'm not going to bend over backward and accommodate for every crackpot idea that people can fathom.