Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,393 Year: 3,650/9,624 Month: 521/974 Week: 134/276 Day: 8/23 Hour: 4/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Air Force Academy creates worship area for Pagans, Druids, and Wiccans
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 22 of 244 (556502)
04-20-2010 6:11 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Faith
04-20-2010 2:17 AM


Faith writes:
The idea that the first amendment was ever meant to give space to anything OTHER than the Christian religion in this nation is something you and I are going to disagree on.
Does this include Eastern Orthodox? Mormons? Jehova's Witnesses? Christian Scientists? Scientologists? Catholics? Seventh-Day Adventists? Unitarians (do not believe in the trinity)? Universalists? Congregationalists? Unification Church? Luthern? Angligan? Assemblies of God? Episcopalian? Presbytarian? Methodist? Independent Baptist? Southern Baptist? Freewill Baptist? Calvanists? Calvary Chapel (Foursquare)? Petacostals? Quakers? Menonites? Amish? Church of Christ? Christian Church? non-afiliated Deists? etc, etc ad infinitim
Faith, I do not want some cliche, unhonest answer. Honestly where do we draw the line in the sand here?

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Faith, posted 04-20-2010 2:17 AM Faith has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 65 of 244 (556708)
04-20-2010 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by ZephyrWiccan
04-20-2010 7:29 PM


Re: ATTN: Everyone, here is an update
ZephyrWiccan writes:
Wow, looking around more, it appears Christians have chosen to show the "love" and desecrate the site:...What is wrong with these people?
Don't you know that as long as you are a Christian and doing things with a Christian motive it is ok to disobey the law?
Yet if a pentagram was placed outside a christian church, an all-out witch hunt (pun intended) and criminal prosecution would ensue. It is all pure hipocracy and double-standard.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by ZephyrWiccan, posted 04-20-2010 7:29 PM ZephyrWiccan has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 68 of 244 (556713)
04-20-2010 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Jazzns
04-20-2010 3:21 PM


Re: "New" First Ammendment
Jazzns writes:
Faith writes:
Here's where I think the nation is REALLY going, however:
Due to the passage of time and changing customs in the nation, many have come to regard the first amendment guaranteeing religious freedom to be ambiguous, which has led to rancorous disputation that disturbs the peace. We propose an amendment in the hope of resolving the dispute.
Since Congress has made no law breaching the original amendment but on the other hand the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution in such a way as to make such a law in any case, on occasion prohibiting the freedom of specifically the Christian religion (forbidding children to use the Bible in their work, or even bring it to school, or a teacher to have it on his/her desk) while advancing the interests of other religions in the public schools (having children celebrate Ramadan), for instance, we propose that this interpretation of the amendment be explicitly stated:
The visible practice of Christianity in the nation should be utterly abolished, and Christians subject to fines for any public display of their beliefs. They should further be made to feel the humiliation of their foolish and ignorant beliefs by being elbowed off the sidewalk and spat upon by Muslims as has been done in the past and is still done in the practice of dhimmitude in some Muslim nations. Regular raids on Christian households should also be encouraged as also practiced in some Muslim nations, also Hindu nations for that matter, burning their houses and churches and the people themselves. In other nations, however, dhimmitude is also practiced against Jews and Hindus and any nonMuslim religion, so we explicitly forbid that. Except for the Jews. A modified dhimmitude is permitted against Jews, Zionist Jews in particular. But Christians are to be most especially so treated. Churches should be taxed or turned over to the government to be used for other purposes. We particularly recommend the voodoo ritual of eating the head off a live chicken to be practiced on church lawns and encourage the making of voodoo curses against Christians...
Lets find out. Anyone else in this thread, do you support in any way the 2nd version of Faith's proposed ammendment?
Yes, all us evil scheming nazi socialist communist leftist atheists and non-believers want to burn your Bibles and Churches, drive you God-fearing Christians out of your homes and country, forbid you to pray, teach, preach or worship your god, etc.
Oh, wait, that's right! It was Christians who promoted these same actions against the Jews and other ethnic groups! Case in point:
The Great Protestant Reformer Martin Luther in 'On the Jews and Their Lies' writes:
Accordingly, it must and dare not be considered a trifling matter but a most serious one to seek counsel against this and to save our souls from the Jews, that is, from the devil and from eternal death. My advice, as I said earlier, is:
First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire...
Second, that all their books-- their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-- be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted...
Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country...
Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it...
But what will happen even if we do burn down the Jews' synagogues and forbid them publicly to praise God, to pray, to teach, to utter God's name? They will still keep doing it in secret. If we know that they are doing this in secret, it is the same as if they were doing it publicly. For our knowledge of their secret doings and our toleration of them implies that they are not secret after all and thus our conscience is encumbered with it before God...
If we wish to wash our hands of the Jews' blasphemy and not share in their guilt, we have to part company with them. They must be driven from our country...
...they remain our daily murderers and bloodthirsty foes in their hearts. Their prayers and curses furnish evidence of that, as do the many stories which relate their torturing of children and all sorts of crimes for which they have often been burned at the stake or banished...
...that everyone would gladly be rid of them...
If I had power over the Jews, as our princes and cities have, I would deal severely with their lying mouth...
They [rulers] must act like a good physician who, when gangrene has set in proceeds without mercy to cut, saw, and burn flesh, veins, bone, and marrow. Such a procedure must also be followed in this instance. Burn down their synagogues, forbid all that I enumerated earlier, force them to work, and deal harshly with them, as Moses did...
If this does not help we must drive them out like mad dogs.
If you're going to rape, pillage and burn, be sure to do things in that order
No, this is another typical ludicrous fundamentalist strawman characture and really nothing more than projecting their own hypocritical, dogmatic and intollerance onto others. Nothing new.
I am all for freedom for all religious beliefs no matter how ridiculously stupid they are (case in point, Scientology), as long as they don't infringe on the rights, freedoms and beliefs or non-beliefs of others.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Jazzns, posted 04-20-2010 3:21 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 104 of 244 (556806)
04-21-2010 5:52 AM


The bottom line is that it is unfair to all Americans to promote one religion in the schools, government, etc at the expense of those who practice other religions.
Freedom of religion does not grant you the right to trample the freedoms of other religions (or non-believers) whether it be at school, government, the military or any other means of employment inside the United States of America.
That is true justice (the concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, fairness, or equity). And yes justice would cease to exist without their being people to which it applies to.
If you want a theocracy move to Iran, Saudi Arabia or the Vatican. Or go off and create your own.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 12:45 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied
 Message 174 by Buzsaw, posted 04-22-2010 8:16 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 106 of 244 (556853)
04-21-2010 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by ZenMonkey
04-21-2010 10:12 AM


Re: Endorsement Not Establishment
ZenMonkey writes:
But you do realize that the only Religion is Christianity? If it's not Christianity, then it's not Religion at all but a trap of Satan. Thus the First Ammendment is only about protecting Christianity.
That's funny. Most fundamentalists say Christianity is not a religion:
Ray Comfort writes:
The Bible only mentions "religion" five times. Three times the Apostle Paul uses the word in reference to his pre-Christian life. The other references are in the context of religious hypocrisy (see James 1:26-27). I try and distance myself as far as possible from those religious folks who insist that salvation comes from religious works. I don’t believe that, I don’t practice that, and I don’t want to have anything to do with that.
Man has always used religion for his own political or economic gain. Hitler did it. America does it. Iran does it. The Pharisees in the time of Christ did it.
Religion is very grimy and murky bathwater, and those who don’t look carefully can easily miss the baby. A world without religionhow wonderful that would be. May God hasten the day.
also
James A. Fowler, Christ in You Ministries writes:
Christianity is NOT Religion
The Latin word from which the English word "religion" is derived means "to bind up." Jesus did not come to bind us up in rules and regulations or rituals of devotion, but to set us free to be man as God inended.
I guess they can't make up their minds?

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by ZenMonkey, posted 04-21-2010 10:12 AM ZenMonkey has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 1:08 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 130 of 244 (556931)
04-21-2010 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Faith
04-21-2010 3:32 PM


Re: How America is/was Christian and how it is not
Faith writes:
Unfortunately some did. Much later, though, in and after the Reformation, and in Luther's case he regretted having any part in it.
No he didn't. He wrote the 'Jews and Their Lies' only 3 years before his death. He died hating the Jews and advocating persecution of the Jews as shown in his last sermon four days before his death:
Martin Luther writes:
The Jews are our public enemies; they do not cease to defame Christ our Lord, to call the Virgin Mary a whore and Christ a bastard, ‘and if they could kill us all, they would gladly do so. And they often do'...
As soon as the Jews will convert themselves to us and end their blasphemies and their other deeds, we will forgive them. Otherwise we will not bear nor tolerate them any longer.
He was also successful in having them killed and expelled from several regions of Germany including Saxony, Brandenburg, and Silesia within a few years before his death as attested to many eyewitnesses.
Josel Rosheim, advocate and general counsel (lawyer) of Jews in Germany and Poland during the reigns of the emperors of Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I and Charles V in 1537 writes:
Elector John Frederick of Saxony, on the instigation of the priest named Luther, resolved to expel the Jews. This same Luther who wrote many books against us and declared that whoever was using the Jews lost its share of future world. In truth, it made our situation very dangerous. I therefore carry letters from various Christian scholars - some in Strasbourg - in Thuringia and parties in search of the voter. I did not find him there because he went to Frankfurt am Main with other voters, including the Brandenburg who also wanted to expel its Jews. With many Christian scholars, I undertook to refute the arguments of Martin Luther and Butzer (Strasbourg), and I was favorably listened. A miracle happened, then we learned then that the 38 Jews who were burned in Berlin, 5270 (1410), were innocent. The thief of the monstrance had confessed his crime, but the bishop, unjust man if he was, had forbidden the confessor of Duke Joachim I reveal the truth to his master. Everyone, including the Duke Joachim, kept their promise. Only the elector of Saxony betrays us and caused us great harm. He was punished...
Jews of Bohemia and Prague were subjected to many trials and deportation. With other good people, I went before the king, in Prague, and obtained his help. I could rejoice to see the expelled to return home and rebuild the ruins. On 1 Tamuz 5307 (1547), I found myself in Prague and learned that the quarrels were resumed...
Five Jews - a man, three women and a girl - were accused of ritual murder of a child. They were extensively tortured and nearly died. For a month, along with Rabbi Selkelin and Rabbi S., introduced him to Wurtzburg and Speyer, the letters of the emperor. After spending many defendants were found innocent and released. The girl had sanctified the Holy Name in resisting torture for 32 weeks...
But the Jews were expelled from Mainz, Landau and Ensingen...
Chancellor Granvelle became our interpreter and told the Emperor the following:
"The Jews have already suffered greatly from attacks by Lutherans, and now your Spanish troops did not meet the new privileges that you come to accord."
Hmm, torturing, expelling and burning Jews. Hmm, that sounds familiar. I wonder where Hitler got his ideas from?
There was no contrition in Luther's heart for the Jews. He along with Calvin were petty religious thugs who advocated and caused the persecution and deaths of innocent people. End of story.
Calvin seems to have retained too much of the Catholic idea that it's right to persecute heretics, and that spirit has erupted from time to time since, quite true, but in brief limited events against which soberer minds soon prevailed, nothing like the Inquisition.
Your condoning their murderous, hate-filled speach and actions is hypocritical and revulting. And you wonder why non-believer want nothing to do with you.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 3:32 PM Faith has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 132 of 244 (556934)
04-21-2010 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Faith
04-21-2010 3:16 PM


Re: How America is/was Christian and how it is not
The Catholic Church had been killing and persecuting Christians such as the Waldensians and Albigensians for centuries. If it wasn't officially under the title of the office of the Inquisition it was the same in spirit.
So have the Protestants. I see no difference except in scope. They both have blood on their hands.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 3:16 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 7:07 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 133 of 244 (556935)
04-21-2010 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Faith
04-21-2010 1:08 PM


Re: the term "religion"
There is definitely a confusion about the meaning of the term "religion" among Christians. The term is rejected these days because it is understood to refer to a ritualistic set of practices or a list of do's and don't's, which is the case in most of the world's religions and much of Christianity as well, in contrast to a living relationship with the living God which is the true form of Christianity.
The difference is? The whole bible is a book of religious do's and don't's. In order to have a relationship with God you have to conform to these religious do's and don'ts do you not? You need to repent, pray, worship god, etc, etc. I really do not see the diference.
However, this can be confusing when you see how the term is used in general, and particularly how it was used just a couple of centuries ago among Christians to refer specifically to Christianity itself, as among the American founders for instance. Christians who have no sense of history simply use the term in its most recent evangelical sense and this confuses people who know it in more than one sense.
I think you confuse yourself or I should say brainwash yourself.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 1:08 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 7:08 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 173 of 244 (557014)
04-22-2010 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 157 by Faith
04-22-2010 1:19 AM


Re: How America is/was Christian and how it is not
Faith writes:
Columbus's motives were entirely Christian, basically to convert the world to Christ wherever he found anyone in need of conversion. Yes he was looking for a route to India but he understood that God led him to the New World instead.
Sure if you call enslaving indigenent people of a country and shipping them back to Europe as slaves Christian. I will go with that.
Christopher Columbus writes:
As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.
...their Highnesses may see that I shall give them as much gold as they need .... and slaves as many as they shall order to be shipped
Columbus was a an entrepeneurer and an exploiter who used his religion as many did, to cloke the attrocities he committed. Nothing more.
Because he did not send back enough gold his first trip on his succeeding trips to the New World he sent back over 1200 Native Americans as slaves to Europe to impress King Ferdinand and Queen Isabel who financially backed his ventures, and thus effectively kick-started the massive gears of the Slave Trade machine into work. Columbus also enslaved nearly all the inhabitants he found and put them to work finding the gold he so desparetely wanted and needed to keep his ventures afloat (literally). However, there was very little gold in the Indies and so he built encampments and plantations on which he enslaved the Native Americans and put them to work to help pay back his massive debt.
Here is more of the story I found interesting and quite disturbing:
'Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress: People's History of the United States' by Howard Zinn writes:
In Book Two of his History of the Indies, Las Casas (who at first urged replacing Indians by black slaves, thinking they were stronger and would survive, but later relented when he saw the effects on blacks) tells about the treatment of the Indians by the Spaniards. It is a unique account and deserves to be quoted at length:
"Endless testimonies . . . prove the mild and pacific temperament of the natives.... But our work was to exasperate, ravage, kill, mangle and destroy; small wonder, then, if they tried to kill one of us now and then.... The admiral, it is true, was blind as those who came after him, and he was so anxious to please the King that he committed irreparable crimes against the Indians..."
Las Casas tells how the Spaniards "grew more conceited every day" and after a while refused to walk any distance. They "rode the backs of Indians if they were in a hurry" or were carried on hammocks by Indians running in relays. "In this case they also had Indians carry large leaves to shade them from the sun and others to fan them with goose wings."
Total control led to total cruelty. The Spaniards "thought nothing of knifing Indians by tens and twenties and of cutting slices off them to test the sharpness of their blades." Las Casas tells how "two of these so-called Christians met two Indian boys one day, each carrying a parrot; they took the parrots and for fun beheaded the boys."
The Indians' attempts to defend themselves failed. And when they ran off into the hills they were found and killed. So, Las Casas reports. "they suffered and died in the mines and other labors in desperate silence, knowing not a soul in the world to whom they could tun for help." He describes their work in the mines:
"... mountains are stripped from top to bottom and bottom to top a thousand times; they dig, split rocks, move stones, and carry dirt on their backs to wash it in the rivers, while those who wash gold stay in the water all the time with their backs bent so constantly it breaks them; and when water invades the mines, the most arduous task of all is to dry the mines by scooping up pansful of water and throwing it up outside....
After each six or eight months' work in the mines, which was the time required of each crew to dig enough gold for melting, up to a third of the men died. While the men were sent many miles away to the mines, the wives remained to work the soil, forced into the excruciating job of digging and making thousands of hills for cassava plants.
Thus husbands and wives were together only once every eight or ten months and when they met they were so exhausted and depressed on both sides . . . they ceased to procreate. As for the newly born, they died early because their mothers, overworked and famished, had no milk to nurse them, and for this reason, while I was in Cuba, 7000 children died in three months. Some mothers even drowned their babies from sheer desperation.... In this way, husbands died in the mines, wives died at work, and children died from lack of milk . . . and in a short time this land which was so great, so powerful and fertile ... was depopulated.... My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature, and now I tremble as I write...."
When he arrived on Hispaniola in 1508, Las Casas says, "there were 60,000 people living on this island, including the Indians; so that from 1494 to 1508, over three million people had perished from war, slavery, and the mines. Who in future generations will believe this? I myself writing it as a knowledgeable eyewitness can hardly believe it...."
Thus began the history, five hundred years ago, of the European invasion of the Indian settlements in the Americas. That beginning, when you read Las Casas-even if his figures are exaggerations (were there 3 million Indians to begin with, as he says, or less than a million, as some historians have calculated, or 8 million as others now believe?) is conquest, slavery, death. When we read the history books given to children in the United States, it all starts with heroic adventure-there is no bloodshed-and Columbus Day is a celebration.
So basically Columbus was a cruel, money-hungry tyrant and exploiter who used religion to cloak his abuses (slavery, torture, raping native women, needless killing and murder even of native children, greed, deception, etc, etc), which was of course par for the course during that day and age (and in some places today). So you may really want to reconsider whether you want to brand Columbus' actions or motives as Christian.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Faith, posted 04-22-2010 1:19 AM Faith has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 177 of 244 (557041)
04-22-2010 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 174 by Buzsaw
04-22-2010 8:16 AM


Re: Again And Again, Promoting Not Establishment
Well then, you are implying that the founders of the US of A republic and our Constitution were unfair, promoting the Christian religion and encouraging the usage of the New England Primer, the Bible and Watts Hymnal etc exclusively in the schools.
#1 Define 'founders'.
#2 Not all the founding fathers, however you define them, actively encouraged the usage of the New England Primer, the Bible and Watts Hymnal usage in schools. Can you provide evidence indicating this to be true?
# 3 There were very few printed books that most common people had possession of besides a Bible or a hymnal, mainly because this was the frontier and printing presses were few and far between.
#4 Many children (mainly boys) were taught at home until they entered apprenticeships as opposed to school houses.
#5 Many schoolhouses in that era were actually the village church thus teaching using Bibles and hymnals were rather convenient.
#6 No schools were paid directly out of federal funds until the 1920s. All of it was paid initially by local citizens and local governments (villages funds) and then later by municipalities and states and then finally in the early 20th century by federal funds. Therefore, the federal government had little room for regulating the separation of church and state of a non-federally funded school system.
So bottom line is that 'necessity' at the time made it convenient for them to use these religious materials in 'schools' and in essence most of these schools were really 'private' schools until the late 19th and early 20th century.
Also, nearly everyone during that timeframe in the colonies was of the 'Christian' mindset or influence. However, the framers of the constitution, though many Christians themselves, specifically went out of their way to enforce religious neutrality and separation of Church and State both in the Constitution and other related documents so as not to fall into the pitfalls of religious persecution prevalent in many other preceding governments.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Buzsaw, posted 04-22-2010 8:16 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 178 of 244 (557056)
04-22-2010 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by Buzsaw
04-22-2010 8:16 AM


Re: Again And Again, Promoting Not Establishment
You keep on keeping on ignoring the valid point that in a republic the representatives of the republic determine to what extent anything should be promoted or excluded.
So if satanists outnumbered Christians in America, than you would be ok if Satanism was enforced in the US government rather than Christianity?

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Buzsaw, posted 04-22-2010 8:16 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 197 of 244 (557148)
04-23-2010 3:55 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by Faith
04-21-2010 7:08 PM


Re: the term "religion"
ABE: But to try to state it: religion is NOTHING BUT following rituals and do's and don't's, no relationship with God whatever.
That is not what Muslims or Jews believe or nearly any other religion. This is your own stereotypical biased view of other religions. Anyone of another religion can say the same thing about Christianity.
Case in point:
People's Relationship With Allah
Jewish faith and God: The relationship with God

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 7:08 PM Faith has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 199 of 244 (557153)
04-23-2010 4:48 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by Faith
04-21-2010 7:07 PM


Re: How America is/was Christian and how it is not
Faith writes:
I do not deny that there was some, but please name the incidents of Protestant blood on their hands and give statistics comparing the scope of their offenses to the Catholic church's.
Comparing statistics is a cop-out. Is it any more correct if 50 people are tortured and murdered than if 5000 are? However here are a few examples of attrocities conducted in the name of the protestant religion directly by protestants and invoking the Bible to defend their actions:
1. The Red Holocaust: The Native American Slaughter in which Protestant Christians drove out and killed either directly or indirectly literally millions of Native Americans in the name of Manifest or Divine Destiny, in which they believed they had the God-given right and envoked 'Divine Providence' to take any land they discovered either peacebly or if necessary (and very often) by force on their westward march through North America irregardless of the native inhabitants.
Journalist John L. O'Sullivan writes:
And that claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us.
President Andrew Jackson enacted the "Indian Removal Act" in 1830 which by military force evicted over 70,000 Indians from most of the Southeastern USA and in which over 10,000 died either because of the forced eviction itself or the disease and starvation that directly resulted from these measures. One of the most appalling cases was the 'Trail of Tears' in which all of the Cherokee tribes (who were at the time peaceful allies of the American people) located in Georgia and Florida were forcibly removed a thousand miles to Oklahoma, and in which about 4000 men, women and children died along the way. In some cases smallpox laiden blankets were given to Native Americans in order to introduce disease into their villages and thus weaken and reduce their population.
Colonel Bouquet writes:
I will try to inoculate the [Indians] with some blankets that may fall into their hands, and take care not to get the disease myself. As it is pity to expose good men against then, I wish we could make use of the Spanish method, to hunt them with English dogs, supported by rangers and some light horse, who would, I think, effectually extirpate or remove the vermin.
Kenneth Davis writes:
Hollywood has left the impression that the great Indian wars came in the Old West during the late 1800's, a period that many think of simplistically as the "cowboy and Indian" days. But in fact that was a "mopping up" effort. By that time the Indians were nearly finished, their subjugation complete, their numbers decimated. The killing, enslavement, and land theft had begun with the arrival of the Europeans. But it may have reached its nadir when it became federal policy under President (Andrew) Jackson.
Much of these attrocities were conducted envoking their 'God-given' rights and freedoms to move west irregardless of the Native American inhabitants and the often disasterous results that ensued.
2. Southern Slavery: White southern protestant slave owners used the Bible to defend their right to own millions of slaves and many though not all believed that they had the right to fervently discipline their slaves, as property. Slaves were often tortured, raped (in the case of the women and young girls), and killed if they tried to resist or escape. Many protestant pastors of the South actively endorsed these rights to owning slaves stating it was a God-given right and duty as shown in the Bible.
3. Witch Trials in Colonial America. Need I say more?
In fact, just the two examples above of attrocities that occured under the government of Protestant Christians puts the inquisition to shame. The Spanish Inquisition held about 49,000 trials in Europe, tortured many of those tried and killed about 4-5000 of those people. That pales in comparision to the hundreds of thousands to millions of Native Americans raped, murdered and pillaged by both Catholic and Protestant Christians alike.
Am I saying that all Protestant Americans participated in these attrocities? Of course not. But were all Catholic Europeans advocates of the Inquisition?
My point being that their is plently of blame to be spread around on both sides. Both sides were complicit in these attrocities and both Protestant and Catholics at the time bear the blame.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Faith, posted 04-21-2010 7:07 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024