You guys use talkorigins as your comprehensive resource?? what a joke!!
They mostly put forth their ideas, and set up their own straw men arguments to knock down as though they were serious arguments as all that any creationist has.
And here folks lies the rub. Creationists are unable to think critically. You sound like the wingnuts that claim Snopes.com is a liberal front group. What both of these sites have is sourcing.
Look at every article on talkorigins. Do you notice that they all cite a source. This would allow anyone, yes anyone even an anti-science creationist, to look at the original source material and confirm it is correct. Do you know any creationist sites that cite original scientific material? There aren't any.
You might want to consider some critical thinking. The science types here and the "evolutionists" here tend to have good critical thinking skills. They do not accept things at face value. The make sure that statements and assertions on sites like talkorigins are based on good science. Talkorigins has a reputation as a site that uses strong scientific sources. That is why it is used a as a resource.
You question talkorigins? Then provide evidence that something posted there is wrong. I am sure you can't.
Seems rather weak, since most of those arguments are about philosophy, rather than science.
Do you have an example for this line of crap you are positing?
No science in there though. Thats one thing the evolutionist can never be honest about.
Have you even actually read anything on the site? If so, did you understand anything? Because all this statement from you does is expose your extreme ignorance. Tell you what; look at sources on the creationist websites. The only thing they source is a bible, and depending on which bible different sites may come to totally different conclusions.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
™ Version 4.2
