Potential Evidence for a Global Flood

I would absolutely LOVE to see Buz explain the physics behind his "vapor canopy."- How the equivalent amount of water could be suspended in the upper atmosphere without causing debilitating pressures beneath
- How the equivalent amount of water could precipitate without poaching the earth's atmosphere
- How the equivalent amount of water could possibly affect the decay rates of multiple radioactive isotopes in a congruent fashion.
- How the equivalent amount of water could possibly allow enough light to traverse to foster photosynthesis at the earth's surface.This vapor canopy thing is so absurd. Creationists would be much better off saying that the flood was a miracle and can not be proven or disproven by science.

That's what makes the "vapor canopy" claim so peculiar. We know the results it would produce because we have a test case next door. Yet they continue to promote it despite the evidence against them. But, then again, facts have never stopped them before.