Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hugh Ross
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2133 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 20 of 90 (569949)
07-24-2010 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Flyer75
07-24-2010 7:07 PM


"So-called" evidence
The so-called 'scientific' evidence for an old earth is based on uniformitarian stratigraphy, radiometric geochronology, and a self-avowed bias against the Bible...
The evidence is more than "so-called." It is something that people of all faiths or no faith can observe--anyone can observe it but bible literalists. They have chosen to deliberately ignore that evidence.
And the bible is not inerrant. Young earth and the global flood about 4,350 years are two biblical claims that have been completely disproved--to all but biblical literalists.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Flyer75, posted 07-24-2010 7:07 PM Flyer75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Flyer75, posted 07-24-2010 7:42 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024