Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?
archaeologist
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 549 (573925)
08-13-2010 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
08-05-2010 2:38 PM


Re: Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?
The supernatural hypothesis has failed
no it hasn't, it is just foolishness on the part of the unbeliever to expect to understand the Bible or expect God to answer their demands when they do not believe the Bible or Him.
plus it is ridiculous to think that secular science is capable of determining anything about the supernatural when it is designed to only look at the natural things. it is also ludiicrious to think that secular scientists could actually construct viable tests that would examine the supernatural when the supernatural does not act according to secular science and its desires.
All those questions that have been able to be adequately explored have resulted in the overturning of the mystical, magical and supernatural explanation by means of examining and understanding the entirely natural.
this has not been done since the natural is not the way origins came about. the natural explanation cannot be verified by actual observation of the actual events leading up to the oroigins of all things in this universe.
if anything, secular science and scientists have only demonstrated their immaturity, foolishness by claiming such things while advocating the very they cannot meet with their experiments.
case in point:
http://news.yahoo.com/...811/sc_nm/us_argentina_lake_science
The bacteria's habitat is similar to primitive earth
that is just one of the impossible things that secular scientists cannot verify, prove or observe thus it is insane to even promote such thinking.
they have no clue what primitive earth looked like or what really inhabited it. so to make the foolish statements you have made only reflects badly upon all secular scientists and their anti-biblical work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 08-05-2010 2:38 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 08-13-2010 8:36 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 130 by Bikerman, posted 08-13-2010 8:38 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 131 by Straggler, posted 08-13-2010 9:05 AM archaeologist has not replied
 Message 132 by bluescat48, posted 08-13-2010 12:48 PM archaeologist has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024