Why complex form requires an Intelligent Designer

gasby Dubious claim but even playing devils advocate it reamins a fact that IDists do not define at all just what the intelligence actually is.

gasby Intelligent design advocates claim that the complexity of the world is only explainable in terms of an "intelligence" doing the "design". However they ,when pressed , fail to apply the logic of their hypothesis to the assumed intellgence itself.
Since it can be reasonably assumed that the intelligence ,whatever that is, must needs be more complicated than that which it creates, the proponents fail to realize that the hypothesis must also apply to the complexity of the intelligent agent and we arrive at a logic loop that runs into the non terminating process known as ad infinitum.The intelligent desiner ,being of greater complexity itself than that which it designs is subject to the terms of the hypothesis and we need follow up with the question of what created the complexity of this intelligent designer? And so on and so on... etc. I do not need to do that. The onus is on they who make the claim to support their contention for this. As I outlined above the hypothesis breaks itself{ complexity is only explainable through an intelligent agent} apart when we apply it to a premise{intelligent designer} that it makes.

gasby My arguement does not need to know just what the intelligent designer is. It merely states that whatever the ID is it must be more complex than that which it designs. Since it is so complex the hypothesis applies to it and we form the question of what created that creator{ and so on...} And I do not expect it from them. I do however expect them to declare that their arguement be universaly applicable.