Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Larni
Member (Idle past 163 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 391 of 683 (634153)
09-19-2011 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 390 by Buzsaw
09-19-2011 3:40 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Done and done.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 390 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 3:40 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 9:13 PM Larni has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 392 of 683 (634202)
09-19-2011 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 391 by Larni
09-19-2011 5:17 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Done and done.
Thanks Larni. To be consistent, it would be great if you would attribute the other statements to their respective authors as well since it appears that those are from me to you.
Perhaps by and by you'll think of something more inspirational for your readers whenever they read your messages.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 391 by Larni, posted 09-19-2011 5:17 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 393 by Theodoric, posted 09-19-2011 9:15 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9076
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 393 of 683 (634203)
09-19-2011 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 392 by Buzsaw
09-19-2011 9:13 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
it would be great if you would attribute the other statements to their respective authors as well
Maybe they don't want the attribution.
since it appears that those are from me to you.
No it doesnt.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 392 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 9:13 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 394 of 683 (634205)
09-19-2011 9:35 PM


NOT A DISCUSSION TOPIC
This is a place to report discussion problems, not a place to debate those problems.
Everyone, stop, or suspensions may be coming.
And of course, no replies to this message.
Adminnemooseus

Please be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems.

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3630 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


(1)
Message 395 of 683 (634398)
09-21-2011 9:33 AM


percy completely out of line.
Someone needs to remind him that this is supposed to be a debate site. If someone uses the defense, as WK did in the "Wright et al. on the Process of Mutation" that the "modern synthesis" takes all of the Shapiros new found discoveries into account, he should be expected to explain that. It is completely ON TOPIC and appropriate to address his point that he has not made a clear explanation of what this means.
Since Percy has shown over and over again that he is completely incapable of moderating such discussions fairly, and since he simply wants to hold a grudge because I disagree with his point of view, shouldn't a more fair moderator be used to decide what is and isn't on topic? Why did you bring in a so called 'creationist" moderator in Chuck77 if Percy is still going to continue to just barricade the doors for any discussions that challenge the prevailing point of view on EVC?
How can anyone be expected to have a discussion about evolution, if pro-evolutionists are allowed to throw out any term they want, without the responsibility of defining those terms. One side is allowed to say anything they want, but the other side can never challenge it.
As soon as I start a new topic to discuss the issue, Percy will also decide what he thinks can be discussed in that topic as well, and it becomes a never ending game of Percy trying to control who is winning any debate. If Dr. A cries that something is off topic because it is too difficult to answer, Percy will come running with his diapers to help him. Its disgusting.
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 396 by Son, posted 09-21-2011 10:27 AM Bolder-dash has replied
 Message 399 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-21-2011 11:43 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Son
Member (Idle past 3829 days)
Posts: 346
From: France,Paris
Joined: 03-11-2009


Message 396 of 683 (634405)
09-21-2011 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 395 by Bolder-dash
09-21-2011 9:33 AM


Re: percy completely out of line.
{Content hidden. Not a debate/discussion topic. - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Son, : No reason given.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 395 by Bolder-dash, posted 09-21-2011 9:33 AM Bolder-dash has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 397 by Bolder-dash, posted 09-21-2011 10:56 AM Son has not replied

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3630 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 397 of 683 (634409)
09-21-2011 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 396 by Son
09-21-2011 10:27 AM


Re: percy completely out of line.
Actually, I was going to post a link, but then I thought Percy would probably suspend me claiming that my link was off topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 396 by Son, posted 09-21-2011 10:27 AM Son has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 398 by Admin, posted 09-21-2011 11:13 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.2


(4)
Message 398 of 683 (634412)
09-21-2011 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 397 by Bolder-dash
09-21-2011 10:56 AM


Bolder-dash Suspended for 4 Weeks
Hi Bolder-dash,
As you've been informed many times, you can remain here as long as you contribute constructively to discussions, including discussions in threads like this one about discussion problems. Your pattern is to keep escalating until you draw moderator attention, at which point you switch to complaining about moderation.
As I informed you in Message 87 of the Wright et al. on the Process of Mutation thread, administrative action would be the next step. See you next month.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 397 by Bolder-dash, posted 09-21-2011 10:56 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 399 of 683 (634419)
09-21-2011 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 395 by Bolder-dash
09-21-2011 9:33 AM


Re: percy completely out of line.
{Snarky content hidden. Not a debate/discussion topic. Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Hide + note.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 395 by Bolder-dash, posted 09-21-2011 9:33 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Coyote
Member (Idle past 2106 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 400 of 683 (634939)
09-25-2011 12:00 AM


Spam
Spam
Message 251
{Cleanup done - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Replies to this message:
 Message 401 by Panda, posted 10-07-2011 1:56 AM Coyote has not replied

Panda
Member (Idle past 3712 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 401 of 683 (636508)
10-07-2011 1:56 AM
Reply to: Message 400 by Coyote
09-25-2011 12:00 AM


Re: Spam
.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

If I were you
And I wish that I were you
All the things I'd do
To make myself turn blue

This message is a reply to:
 Message 400 by Coyote, posted 09-25-2011 12:00 AM Coyote has not replied

Panda
Member (Idle past 3712 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
Message 402 of 683 (636509)
10-07-2011 1:56 AM


Chuck77
Chuckles has started sending me PMs like:
Chuckles writes:
following me around? Your a fag right? Admit it...nothing better to do? but follow me...yer such a little wuss......
Is this the correct behaviour for an admin?
{abe}
And since my member rating has dropped from 7.4 to 5.9 within 10 minutes, I expect that he is now down-voting each of my posts.
*shrug*
{abe}
Ah yes.
I found one post from 03/12/2010 which he has now down-voted.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

If I were you
And I wish that I were you
All the things I'd do
To make myself turn blue

Replies to this message:
 Message 403 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 2:45 AM Panda has replied
 Message 409 by Omnivorous, posted 10-07-2011 10:30 AM Panda has seen this message but not replied

Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 403 of 683 (636510)
10-07-2011 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 402 by Panda
10-07-2011 1:56 AM


Re: Chuck77
Admin writes:
Perhaps members who are commenting on each other rather than on the threads they're watching could use PM's instead of posting messages here? There is that handy little "Send Private Message" link beneath each member's info summary.
Message 1709
Just following Admins advise instead of airing it in the forum like you are. You really are clueless. Get a clue, get a freeking clue.
You follow me around and add nothing to the debate other than to harrass me with your pathetic off topic comments. Deal with it.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 402 by Panda, posted 10-07-2011 1:56 AM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 404 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 2:52 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 407 by Panda, posted 10-07-2011 5:13 AM Chuck77 has not replied

Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 404 of 683 (636511)
10-07-2011 2:52 AM
Reply to: Message 403 by Chuck77
10-07-2011 2:45 AM


Re: Chuck77
While we're at it, ill post the message that he wrote that had nothing to do with nothing but to harrass another member
Panda writes:
Cuckold writes:
{hidden text}
For posterity. (Use peek)
Message 53
"Cuckold:In modern terms, a cuckold can also mean a male fetishist who gains sexual gratification from watching his partner have intercourse with other people or having a wife who dates other men, often with the husband's approval."
Cuckold - Wikipedia
That's what he called me for no reason whatsoever. I commented on a thread as to the topic and he followed right behind me with this. And he complains about me?
He should be suspended. I see no reason why he wouldn't. If he doesn't get suspended for this then this there's a problem.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 403 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 2:45 AM Chuck77 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 405 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 3:00 AM Chuck77 has replied

Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 405 of 683 (636512)
10-07-2011 3:00 AM
Reply to: Message 404 by Chuck77
10-07-2011 2:52 AM


Re: Chuck77
He's becoming an increasing problem here on this site with the way he conducts himself. Comment after comment on attacking the poster,Following me and other posters around for no other reason than to harrass. Something needs to happen.
Why is he able to run roughshod on this site when no one esle does?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 404 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 2:52 AM Chuck77 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 406 by Chuck77, posted 10-07-2011 3:52 AM Chuck77 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024