Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 0/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Can I disprove Macro-Evolution

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can I disprove Macro-Evolution
subbie
Member (Idle past 1282 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 9 of 238 (589752)
11-04-2010 10:03 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by JRTjr
11-03-2010 11:37 PM

Recipes, instruction manuals, and blueprints are the hallmark of Intelligent
​
If you could find somewhere on a DNA molecule where it said "Made by YWHWEHWHWY" then you might have something. I'd actually be inclined to believe in intelligent design in that event. Of course, that still wouldn't disprove common descent.
​
Your screed is nothing but classic creationist non sequitors, a list of things you don't understand followed by your statement that all of it means no to evilution.
​
Yawn.
​
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
​
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
​
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
​
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JRTjr, posted 11-03-2010 11:37 PM JRTjr has not replied
subbie
Member (Idle past 1282 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 105 of 238 (590650)
11-09-2010 10:15 AM 		Reply to: Message 104 by Panda
11-09-2010 7:14 AM

Re: Where are we up to, here?
It would have probably helped if he had taken part in his own topic.
​
Oh, I seriously doubt that.
​
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
​
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
​
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
​
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Panda, posted 11-09-2010 7:14 AM Panda has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Panda, posted 11-09-2010 10:27 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied
subbie
Member (Idle past 1282 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 151 of 238 (591079)
11-11-2010 3:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 150 by ICANT
11-11-2010 3:06 PM

Re: 'Macro-Evolution'
The history of 'Macro-Evolution' would be a detailed account of how that process took place to date.
​
Anything short of a detailed account is a partial history.
​
When you have gaps of millions of years you do not have a complete history.
​
So in other words, you won't believe it unless there's evidence of every single step of the way, until each and every question has been answered.
​
Of course, that's not science. That's irrationality.
​
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
​
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
​
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
​
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by ICANT, posted 11-11-2010 3:06 PM ICANT has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by frako, posted 11-11-2010 3:41 PM subbie has seen this message but not replied
 Message 172 by ICANT, posted 11-11-2010 6:15 PM subbie has replied
subbie
Member (Idle past 1282 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 184 of 238 (591140)
11-11-2010 11:32 PM 		Reply to: Message 172 by ICANT
11-11-2010 6:15 PM

Re: 'Macro-Evolution'
Actually knowing each and every step would be science.
​
Anything else is either religion or belief in some system.
​
What a wonderful answer! Thank you.
​
Now, give me one example of any area of science where they have all the answers.
​
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
​
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
​
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
​
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by ICANT, posted 11-11-2010 6:15 PM ICANT has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024