Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,749 Year: 4,006/9,624 Month: 877/974 Week: 204/286 Day: 11/109 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can I disprove Macro-Evolution
ok boy
Member (Idle past 4716 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 05-22-2006


Message 109 of 238 (590699)
11-09-2010 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by ICANT
11-09-2010 2:01 PM


Re: More assertions from jar
hi ICANT, from reading your posts in this thread it appears that you accept that speciation has taken place:
ICANT writes:
I do believe that two population can become so different they can't interbreed as my horse avatar would be evidence of.
this fits the definition of the biological species concept, so no problems there.
Biological species concept - Understanding Evolution
as you are using the definition of 'macro evolution' from the op:
ICANT writes:
JRTjr writes:
I want to vary specific here, when I say Macro-Evolution I am speaking only of a scale of analysis of evolution in separated gene pools. Macroevolutionary studies focus on change that occurs at or above the level of species, in contrast with microevolution, which refers to smaller evolutionary changes (typically described as changes in allele frequencies) within a species or population. {Quoted from Wikipedia.org}
Just so we are on the same page when writing our posts, I am using the definition of 'Macro-Evolution' as presented in the OP.
it would seem as though you accept at least one instance of macro evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by ICANT, posted 11-09-2010 2:01 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by ICANT, posted 11-11-2010 12:13 PM ok boy has replied

ok boy
Member (Idle past 4716 days)
Posts: 12
Joined: 05-22-2006


Message 204 of 238 (591200)
11-12-2010 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by ICANT
11-11-2010 12:13 PM


definition of 'macro evolution'
hi again ICANT, and thank you for the welcome.
ICANT writes:
Were they both hogs? Yes.
Are they classified as different species? Yes, go figure.
To me they are just a different variety of the same thing.
cool, we agree that new species can come into existence.
it seems that we only differ in our interpretation of the definition provided in the op.
OP writes:
change that occurs at or above the level of species
now to me, a change that occurs 'at the level of species' would be an instance of speciation, but you don't seem to share that view. could you expand on what you think a change 'at the level of species' would be?
(eta: by the way, i know you're heavily outnumbered in this thread, so no rush)
Edited by ok boy, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by ICANT, posted 11-11-2010 12:13 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024