From: Leicester, England
Message 9 of 219 (481485)
09-11-2008 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by BVZ
09-10-2008 5:55 AM
Roughly speaking the filter asks three questions and in the following order: (1) Does a law explain it? (2) Does chance explain it? (3) Does design explain it?
1) Do you know of a law that explains it? Nope, you've already said you're not a geologist. So we can rule that out.1
2) Could it have formed by chance? Dunno, I haven't seen your rock, but let's say it has neat layering. Clearly it is vastly unlikely that the grains could have randomly achieved such a position.2
3) So it's designed.
That's how it worksref.
1 - so anyone with half a wit will object that you not knowing the law doesn't mean that there isn't a law (which, btw, would be better rendered as process), and they'd be right. But, here's the thing, the same applies to everything; just because no-one alive today understands the process that led to something doesn't mean there isn't a process.
2 - I say 'clearly' because I have no idea what the chance is. Neither does anyone else. In the ID slight of hand they give you examples like tossing coins and pretend you can extend this to unknown areas. You can't. You can't say anything meaningful about the probability of something until, and unless, you understand the processes around at the time of its occurance.
And there's a second problem here too. Let's suppose that we could find out the probability and it came out to 1x10-18. Gosh, we'd go, that's crazy unlikely, surely such a thing could never happen!
Is that right? Well, let's suppose your rock is 10cm x 10cm x 10 cm, that's 0.001m3. The Earth's crust is varies between 5 and 70 km thick; let's take the lower of those numbers. The Earth has a surface area of 5x108km2, so that's a volume of rock of
5x108km2x5km = 2.5x109km3 = 2.5x1018m3.
Which means there are 2.5x1021 pieces of rock of the size of your sample on earth; so if your rock formed by chance we should expect that there are 2500 pieces of rock of that configuration on earth. Not so unlikely that it exists now, is it?
|This message is a reply to:|
| ||Message 1 by BVZ, posted 09-10-2008 5:55 AM|| ||BVZ has responded|
|Replies to this message:|
| ||Message 11 by BVZ, posted 09-12-2008 1:41 AM|| ||Dr Jack has responded|
| ||Message 16 by Otto Tellick, posted 09-14-2008 9:34 PM|| ||Dr Jack has not yet responded|