Not just simplicity, but absence of "extraneousity" (if I may coin a term for the existence of extraneous features).
This mean not only no vestigial features, but no poorly functioning ones when there are better functioning system in existence elsewhere.
Nuggin, msg 1 writes:
But the Intelligent Design side of the debate has yet to explain their "mechanics".
They also inherit a dumspter load of creationist challenges that also need to be explained in the ID vernacular:
If we were designed from a monkey base then why are monkeys still around?
If Intelligent Design makes new species out of old ones then where are the ones that show features from more than one old species - where are the "hopeful monsters" of ID?
etc etc etc
Enjoy.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 10*26*2005 07:42 PM
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.