zi ko writes:
But to what extend those Darwinists do they accept the idea of importance of the environment and so the information in directing evolution?
If you mean that the environment is the information you keep referring to, then I'm sure you'll be very glad to hear that the "Darwinists" take it into account completely. You might've heard one refer to it, they call it "natural selection".
It seems to me very wrong and unscietific to deliberatly shut the eyes in facing a new possibly wright story, just from the fear of danger of the IDers having an advance.This is my strong impression in my reading of the relevant postings
Since they already take the environment into account, I don't see how they are "shutting the eyes".