Robert Byers writes:
Fossils are just casts of pictures in a moment of time.
It merely shows the vague outline of a creature etc.
Fingerprints are much more fleeting moments of time than fossils. They're much more vaque than many fossils.
By your reasoning, fingerprints are not direct enough evidence to use in criminal investigations. By your reasoning, we should open the prison doors and turn loose everybody who was convicted on fingerprint evidence.
If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate