CogitoErgoSum writes:
First posting, having read these forums from afar, so bear with me. Not my specialisation really, I teach Biology, but having to teach life cycles of stars I did a little research. If our sun is second, or third generation ; as they have found out by looking at the composition, does this not negate the whole "let there be light" narrative. The fact that our sun actually formed from a supernova of a previous sun means we have already had light. I await being torn apart with trepidation !
That might conflict with Genesis, IF extra study wasn't done, because, according to Genesis, NO STARS WERE MADE UNTIL GOD SAID, "LET THERE BE LIGHT", therefore, how could a supernova created our star! (Using your same logic)
™ Version 4.2
