Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 120 (8782 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-21-2017 7:56 AM
90 online now:
Coragyps, DOCJ, herebedragons, PaulK, RAZD (5 members, 85 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: evilsorcerer1
Post Volume:
Total: 816,592 Year: 21,198/21,208 Month: 1,631/2,326 Week: 86/881 Day: 8/78 Hour: 2/0

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
1314
15
1617
...
21Next
Author Topic:   Fox news = false news
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 211 of 310 (661314)
05-04-2012 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by Panda
05-04-2012 12:11 PM


Theodoric is that you?
Panda the British version of Theodoric
No contributions, just being an ass.
Here are all the panda posts for this thread:

quote:
Surely all these numbers are irrelevant?
AE accused jar of being unoriginal.
He stupidly did so using an unoriginal phrase.
Dr. A wasn't playing "who got the most hits on google", he was playing "point at Artemis Entreri the hypocritical idiot".

quote:
Well, at least this time you are actually doing what you say others should do.
Aren't you a clever little boy.
Well done.
________________________________________


quote:
If that was true then we could be brothers!
But it isn't - so you are alone in being the obvious troll on this forum.

quote:
The irony is not obvious to you?
I remember reading something about not casting pearls before you, so instead I'll just post the kind of shit you deserve.

Pointing laughing and calling people names, thanks for your contribution to this thread.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by Panda, posted 05-04-2012 12:11 PM Panda has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Panda, posted 05-04-2012 12:56 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 15948
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 212 of 310 (661315)
05-04-2012 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Artemis Entreri
05-04-2012 12:14 PM


Re: que sera sera
hey i laugh at you almost every day

And one day you will manage to be funny when you do so.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-04-2012 12:14 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:54 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 29183
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 213 of 310 (661316)
05-04-2012 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by Artemis Entreri
05-04-2012 12:13 PM


Re: que sera sera
Did you say "If the thread is about Obama, or criticizing the left the thread is closed within the 1st 15-30 pages, they don't last that long."?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-04-2012 12:13 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:56 PM jar has acknowledged this reply

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 1211 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 214 of 310 (661321)
05-04-2012 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by Artemis Entreri
05-04-2012 12:20 PM


Re: Theodoric is that you?
AE writes:

Panda the British version of Theodoric


Nice. A compliment. Thanks.

AE writes:

No contributions, just being an ass.

AE writes:

Pointing laughing and calling people names, thanks for your contribution to this thread.


More irony? Is it still not obvious to you? Clearly not.

Let's try again...

AE writes:

No contributions, just being an ass.

quote:
Surely all these numbers are irrelevant?
AE accused jar of being unoriginal.
He stupidly did so using an unoriginal phrase.
Dr. A wasn't playing "who got the most hits on google", he was playing "point at Artemis Entreri the hypocritical idiot".
Hmm...this is actually a real contribution - so your own evidence proves you wrong.

You are not very good at this, are you.

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-04-2012 12:20 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:58 PM Panda has responded

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 205 days)
Posts: 3508
Joined: 02-26-2006


(1)
Message 215 of 310 (661330)
05-04-2012 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by Artemis Entreri
05-04-2012 11:50 AM


Re: how much admin ass do you have to kiss around here?
And every time you say that, I will remind you that you refuse to accept my challenge in Message 117 to compare substance in posts, showing that it is indeed you who reigns supreme in substancelessness.

Edited by subbie, : Add linky


Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson

We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate

Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung


This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-04-2012 11:50 AM Artemis Entreri has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:57 PM subbie has responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 216 of 310 (661629)
05-08-2012 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Dr Adequate
05-04-2012 12:20 PM


Re: que sera sera
um...yeaaaaahh riiight,

ok chief.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-04-2012 12:20 PM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 217 of 310 (661630)
05-08-2012 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by jar
05-04-2012 12:20 PM


Re: que sera sera
i dunno can you read?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by jar, posted 05-04-2012 12:20 PM jar has acknowledged this reply

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 218 of 310 (661631)
05-08-2012 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by subbie
05-04-2012 2:39 PM


Re: how much admin ass do you have to kiss around here?
all you due is talk trash.

your substance is pure compost.

SMD


This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by subbie, posted 05-04-2012 2:39 PM subbie has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by subbie, posted 05-08-2012 11:10 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 219 of 310 (661632)
05-08-2012 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 214 by Panda
05-04-2012 12:56 PM


Re: Theodoric is that you?
LOL

um yeahhhhh

suuuuurrrrreeee


This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Panda, posted 05-04-2012 12:56 PM Panda has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Panda, posted 05-08-2012 10:42 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 1211 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
Message 220 of 310 (661646)
05-08-2012 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by Artemis Entreri
05-08-2012 7:58 PM


Re: Theodoric is that you?
Artemis Entreri writes:

your substance is pure compost.

Artemis Entreri writes:

LOL

um yeahhhhh

suuuuurrrrreeee


Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:58 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 205 days)
Posts: 3508
Joined: 02-26-2006


(1)
Message 221 of 310 (661649)
05-08-2012 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by Artemis Entreri
05-08-2012 7:57 PM


Would you like to play a game?
Then take me up on my challenge from Message 117.

What do you have to lose? We all know that even when I whip your sorry ass you'll still claim victory anyway. What's the downside for you, Sport?

{AbE}

You know what! I think I mighta just figured it out. You're kinda shy, aren't you little fella? You're reluctant to start. To get the ball rolling, I'll go ahead and post five of my completely substantive, insult free posts. Then you can see if you can find one of yours. That seems fair.

Message 10, First Amendment analysis of Georgia bible study law

Message 84, an analogy illustrating the importance of the ToE to biology

Message 14, Some misunderstandings about science, and terminology, a discussion of the differences between science and religion

Message 11, Giving ID its due, describing the germ of a good idea in Intelligent Design

Message 40, short discussion on why the absence of evidence is evidence of absence

Ok, you're up, Sport!

Edited by subbie, : As noted

Edited by subbie, : Tyop


Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson

We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate

Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung


This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-08-2012 7:57 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 15948
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 5.7


(2)
Message 222 of 310 (661665)
05-09-2012 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Artemis Entreri
05-04-2012 12:13 PM


Re: que sera sera
the awesome republican primary thread (it even has a snarky title)

No.

When I'm being snarky, you will know about it. The very pillars of the earth will shake and tremble. I do not do snarky by half-measures. But you guys can be paranoid about anything.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Artemis Entreri, posted 05-04-2012 12:13 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Jzyehoshua
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 223 of 310 (663668)
05-26-2012 4:04 AM


All networks biased
Seems like all networks reveal their political biases most during the Primetime viewing slots about 6-9 PM CST. What bugs me is that FOX News gets singled out for being right-wing when the others are left-wing. Look at who CNN and NBC/MSNBC have on at 7-9 PM, the same time O'Reilly, Hannity, and Bret Baier are on. CNN has Anderson Cooper, Piers Morgan, and Erin Burnett. MSNBC has Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, and Rachel Maddow (and used to have Keith Olbermann until recently). CBS News has Steve Kroft and Lesley Stahl (big improvement over Dan Rather). ABC News has Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopolous. Comedy Central has Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart.

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/...rsday-may-17-2012/134932

My point is, the other networks slant left as clearly as FOX News does to the right. They run politically opinionated programming like FOX News does, just to the left, not the right (e.g. Anderson Cooper, Piers Morgan, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Diane Sawyer, George Stephanopolous, Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, and Jon Stewart). The exceptions might be Erin Burnett for CNN and the Kroft/Stahl combination for CBS's 60 Minutes (which may not be liberal, but they replaced Dan Rather, who DEFINITELY was).

Until other networks start airing both conservative and liberal commentators instead of just all liberals, it's hard for me to take seriously the attacks on FOX News as anything other than liberally-motivated propaganda hypocritically ignoring the political motivations of the other news infotainment networks. They all have biases and anyone should be able to recognize pretty clearly where these lie.

Also, the reason FOX gets so many viewers is that it's gaining the whole conservative vote, while the other networks are all fighting among themselves for the liberal vote. I bet if you added up CNN, MSNBC, CBS, and ABC, you'd get about the same total that FOX has. That to me suggests they are all on one side of the political spectrum and FOX on the other.


Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by frako, posted 05-26-2012 5:20 AM Jzyehoshua has responded
 Message 226 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-26-2012 5:54 AM Jzyehoshua has responded
 Message 235 by DrJones*, posted 06-08-2012 1:06 PM Jzyehoshua has not yet responded

  
frako
Member
Posts: 2702
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 224 of 310 (663680)
05-26-2012 5:20 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by Jzyehoshua
05-26-2012 4:04 AM


Re: All networks biased
Say this is a scale from leaning to the right (negative) or to the left (pozitive nubmers.)

-15----------0----------15

The left wing biased media is some where around 4. Fox news is some where around -30.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D - 184 examples of fox News Bias


Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand

Click if you dare!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Jzyehoshua, posted 05-26-2012 4:04 AM Jzyehoshua has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Jzyehoshua, posted 05-26-2012 5:39 AM frako has responded

    
Jzyehoshua
Inactive Member


Message 225 of 310 (663684)
05-26-2012 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 224 by frako
05-26-2012 5:20 AM


Re: All networks biased
Well, it can be decisively shown how liberal the media in general is to the general public. Take for example the following:

-2004 Pew Research Center State of the News Media. Showed 34% of the national press and 23% of the local press are liberal to just 20% of the general public, and 7% of the national press and 12% of the local press are conservative to 33% of the general public. Not only does it show the media is far more liberal than average Americans, but this is even more extreme at the national than local level due apparently to bias in the national ranks for promotion opportunities.
http://www.people-press.org/...05/23/iv-values-and-the-press

-According to the 2008 Color of News report by the Pew Research Center, only FOX was equally critical of both Obama and McCain (40% negative). MSNBC was 73% negative of McCain but just 14% negative of Obama, while CNN was 61% negative of McCain to just 39% negative for Obama.
http://www.journalism.org/node/13437

There was another study as well showing the overall amount of reporting on Obama was far greater than on McCain as well, but that one is always tougher to find.

Edited by Jzyehoshua, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by frako, posted 05-26-2012 5:20 AM frako has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by frako, posted 05-26-2012 6:18 AM Jzyehoshua has responded
 Message 229 by RAZD, posted 05-26-2012 6:49 AM Jzyehoshua has responded

  
RewPrev1
...
1314
15
1617
...
21Next
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017