EvC Forum: The Awesome Republican Primary Thread

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: The Awesome Republican Primary Thread

DC85

Member

Posts: 876

From: Richmond, Virginia USA

Joined: 05-06-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 551 of 1485 (648976)
01-19-2012 3:40 PM

Reply to: Message 541 by Perdition
01-17-2012 5:14 PM

Re: Stephen Colbert-Cain

After polls showing Stephen Colbert with 5% support

You might find this interesting.
Page not found - Public Policy Polling

They found as a third-party candidate, his performance might not be too shabby: He'd pull in 13% of the vote, . In the hypothetical scenario, President Obama would get 41% and Mitt Romney 38%.

Another thing is most of the supporters were pulled from Obama.

I'm starting to think people just are not feeling Romney

Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 541 by Perdition, posted 01-17-2012 5:14 PM		Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 552 by Perdition, posted 01-19-2012 3:45 PM	DC85 has not replied
	Message 609 by joshthomas, posted 01-25-2012 4:05 AM	DC85 has not replied

DC85

Member

Posts: 876

From: Richmond, Virginia USA

Joined: 05-06-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 571 of 1485 (649034)
01-19-2012 10:20 PM

Reply to: Message 563 by Buzsaw
01-19-2012 8:21 PM

Re: Gingrich Will Kick Obama's Butt Go Gingrich!!

He has his record of some immorality and moderate policies coupled with his conversion,

I look through his voting record and I don't see this "Moderate" you speak of. I don't believe I'm seeing "what I want to see" as I definitely see a "moderate" streak in John McCain and Olimpia Snowe.

Please point it out. Keep in mind "Moderate" does not apply to republican positions as opposed to Libertarian positions.

holds a candle to that of President Kennedy and our pal, ultra-horny President Slick Willy Clinton who, alas, was elected to a 2nd term.

Hardly the Kennedy affairs unknown at the time and Clinton's issues were also unknown and still are. The "scandal" happened in the second term.

Of course, back in Kennedy's day there was no fair and balanced Fox New

Of course not. Media Actually was about reporting News instead of of the stupidity we have going on at Fox and MSNBC.

which president Kennedy's immorality could have been aired. The lame-stream liberal media

This is off topic but I feel I need to say it.

The term "Liberal Media" is an Oxymoron when you're talking about for profit corporate media. This in itself should be a hint that there is no liberal media. Only special interest corporate media.

I suggest you fact check your sources instead of tuning to the channel the talks about what you want to hear. Fox and MSNBC are graded factually inaccurate by many studies and CNN is coming up the rear. (Fox being the worst)

Just for chuckles

Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

Edited by DC85, : Added goofy video

This message is a reply to:
	Message 563 by Buzsaw, posted 01-19-2012 8:21 PM		Buzsaw has not replied

DC85

Member

Posts: 876

From: Richmond, Virginia USA

Joined: 05-06-2003

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 591 of 1485 (649168)
01-20-2012 10:39 PM

Reply to: Message 590 by Dr Adequate
01-20-2012 10:10 PM

Re: Adultery Is Good Now, Right-Wing Pundits Explain

Rush Limbaugh:

So Newt wanted an open marriage. BFD. At least he asked his wife for permission instead of cheating on her. That's a mark of character, in my book.

And here's Keith Ablow of Fox News:

1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.

2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married.

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible.

Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether we’ll be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether we’ll want to let him go after one.

It is not often that I am lost for words. Fortunately, in this case it doesn't seem necessary to say anything.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 590 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-20-2012 10:10 PM		Dr Adequate has not replied

DC85

Member

Posts: 876

From: Richmond, Virginia USA

Joined: 05-06-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 596 of 1485 (649266)
01-21-2012 9:31 PM

Reply to: Message 579 by Perdition
01-20-2012 10:46 AM

This year, the nominee will be Romney, since it's his "turn." Next election, it will be Gingrich (unless someone from a major family, like the Bushes or Reagans [fat chance there] decides top run.).

Well at least one of those Reagan boys doesn't have a chance.... Ronald Reagan JR is a Liberal and GASP an Atheist

This message is a reply to:
	Message 579 by Perdition, posted 01-20-2012 10:46 AM		Perdition has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 597 by dwise1, posted 01-21-2012 10:33 PM		DC85 has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

3 online now:	CosmicChimp, PaulK, Percy (Admin)
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0

Summations Only