Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,466 Year: 3,723/9,624 Month: 594/974 Week: 207/276 Day: 47/34 Hour: 3/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Test for Intelligent Design Proponents
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 115 (263852)
11-28-2005 5:21 PM


Can we get back on topic
What is taught is schools is certainly relevant to the ID debate. Indeed, that's where much of the controversy lies.
However, recent messages are wandering into questions of constitutional law. It seems to me that these are drifting too far from the topic.
For the purposes of this thread, I suggest going by the conventional wisdom as established in recent practice including recent court rulings on the church/state issue.
If you want to further debate what should be the proper reading of the constitution, please open a separate thread on that (maybe a thread in Coffee House).
Thanks.


Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by TimChase, posted 11-28-2005 5:30 PM AdminNWR has not replied
 Message 44 by Omnivorous, posted 11-28-2005 7:10 PM AdminNWR has not replied

  
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 115 (263916)
11-28-2005 7:44 PM


Closing this thread temporarily
Cool off time. If you want to discuss Church/State issues, start another thread.


Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by AdminNWR, posted 11-29-2005 11:30 AM AdminNWR has not replied

  
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 115 (264097)
11-29-2005 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by AdminNWR
11-28-2005 7:44 PM


Thread reopened - please stay on topic

Do not reply to church/state separation issues here



This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by AdminNWR, posted 11-28-2005 7:44 PM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Buzsaw, posted 11-29-2005 7:52 PM AdminNWR has replied

  
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 115 (264311)
11-29-2005 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Buzsaw
11-29-2005 7:52 PM


Re: Thread reopened - please stay on topic
Faith was the first to address church/state separtation. Why? Because it was in response to the OP statement below.
It would be on topic to discuss whether the purpose of ID was to get around separation. The question of whether the courts have misapplied the separation issue is very different, and clearly off-topic.
A separate thread could be opened for discussing such issues.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Buzsaw, posted 11-29-2005 7:52 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Faith, posted 11-29-2005 9:00 PM AdminNWR has not replied

  
AdminNWR
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 115 (264759)
12-01-2005 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by TimChase
12-01-2005 12:42 PM


My view of "On Topic"
A little clarification is appropriate here.
The topic was ID. The OP already raised the question of whether ID is an attempt to get around restrictions due church/state separation issues. Discussion of that is on topic.
The thread started to go astray in the second half of Message 3, when that message argued that the constitution was being wrongly applied.
In my opinion, ordinary discussion needs to be tolerant of a little digression here and there. Thus Message 3 was not necessarily a problem. Likewise, I did not see a serious problem in Message 6, since that was a rebuttal of the second half of Message 3.
Shortly after that, it became clear that the thread was being dominated by discussions on constitutional interpretation. It was clear by then that it had gone beyond an allowable digression into being seriously off-topic.
In summary, my view is that minor digressions can be tolerated. Major digressions (those that come to dominate the discussion) are a problem and should be avoided. Those who feel a strong need to continue with a digression should open a separate thread.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by TimChase, posted 12-01-2005 12:42 PM TimChase has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by TimChase, posted 12-01-2005 1:31 PM AdminNWR has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024