Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kent Hovind
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 49 of 349 (627052)
07-26-2011 7:38 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Chuck77
07-26-2011 7:10 AM


Re: Debating creationists
Dr. David Berlinski - On Evolution (1/3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5r5cRlctLM
Haha yea you can spot the guy who posted the video is a creationist the first second you see the video
Comments disabled
http://youtu.be/254wgTgxuj4
I guess he dosent like people pointing out his flaws.
Oh and p.s. Dr. David Berlinski is actualy an agnostic he is just speculative.
Edited by frako, : No reason given.
Edited by frako, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Chuck77, posted 07-26-2011 7:10 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 55 of 349 (627058)
07-26-2011 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Dawn Bertot
07-26-2011 4:53 PM


Re: Debating creationists
What part of creationism is it that you contend is false and how does the TOE interfere with the proposition of creationism or ID?
Well creationism and ID say that man and animals where created in their current form.
Evolution states that the current form of man and animals evolved from other forms of animals.
These statements are exclusive if evolution is true then creationism and ID cannot be true and if creationism or ID is true then evolution cannot be true.
side note:
This does not mean if evolution is wrong then creationism is true and if creationism is wrong then evolution is true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Dawn Bertot, posted 07-26-2011 4:53 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Dawn Bertot, posted 07-30-2011 4:57 PM frako has not replied
 Message 172 by RAZD, posted 08-01-2011 8:50 AM frako has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 105 of 349 (627108)
07-31-2011 4:25 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by IamJoseph
07-31-2011 2:16 AM


Re: Debating creationists
If you differ then pls enlighten via scientific reasoning how this "INFINITE" universe came into being
Zeuse used his lighting to light his fart on fire that is what made the universe npw porve this wrong or teach it in the classrooms as truth or prove your version true

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 2:16 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 115 of 349 (627118)
07-31-2011 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by IamJoseph
07-31-2011 9:56 AM


Re: Debating creationists
Can we see some examples of what is called BS in the Hebrew bible - whether from a view of science, history, geography, math or anything which has been disproven - none were given?
Hows about the flood, the exodus, the leprosy cure, talking animals, the sun stopping, shadow of a sundial going backwards ...... i could go on forever
As for the creationist claims cmmon just look at why do people laugh at creationists on youtube 34 episodes of pure bullshit and explenations why it is bullshit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 9:56 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 10:26 AM frako has replied
 Message 121 by Buzsaw, posted 07-31-2011 11:08 AM frako has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 129 of 349 (627132)
07-31-2011 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Buzsaw
07-31-2011 11:08 AM


Re: People Who Laugh
nope most rather say we just dont know yet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Buzsaw, posted 07-31-2011 11:08 AM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 130 of 349 (627133)
07-31-2011 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by IamJoseph
07-31-2011 10:26 AM


Re: Debating creationists
Yes, the text for leprosy represents the first initiation of medicine as a faculty of science.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
HHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
HHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
HHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
HHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Yea science get 2 pigueons kill one dip the feather of the other in the first ones blood sprincle the blood over the person (or a house) then let the piguen go away from the city.
Yup sounds realy scientific to me hhahahahaahahah
thanx for the laugh
Edited by AdminModulous, : FORMATTING

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by IamJoseph, posted 07-31-2011 10:26 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 205 of 349 (627368)
08-02-2011 8:25 AM


Hahaha the only thing Kent Hovind needs in this video is a foil hat

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by Panda, posted 08-02-2011 10:19 AM frako has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(2)
Message 212 of 349 (627507)
08-02-2011 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 210 by Dawn Bertot
08-02-2011 4:31 PM


Re: Logic demands
then law, order, identifiable purpose and design are proof of a creator.
So
so laws like a2+b2=c2 is evidence of a creator ????
Or is this law just a natural property of a right angle triangle ????
Or do you have any other law in mind ???
And what is this order i keep hearing about all i see is randomness organizing itself according to its properties perfectly natural. Like throwing a coin 100000 times the number of times it lands on heads or tails "organises" itself do to its properties.
Please demonstrate how nature or natural causes is anything more than a display of nature?
please demonstrate how natural causes is an explanation of soley natural causes
natural cause an apple falls down a tree accelerating at roughly 10 meters per second do to the properties of the earth whos mass provides a gravitational force that pulls the apple twords the earth. No supernatural causes needed.
Please explain how law, order, identifiable purpose and design are less min evidence, or why the are inadequate to draw a conclusion, like that of natural causes.
Because laws are the way things behave do to the properties they have like things with a higher mass need more energy to move as fast then things with less mass. Or a2+b2=c2 is a property of a right angle triangle,
no creator or designer or magic unicorn needed for laws or the caos you call order.
keeping in mind you have completely bungled even the use of natural causes. There is only nature, not causes for nature.
You are arguing like the ancient Greeks argued someone had to have lit the stars on fire so logically there has to be a magic person with a lighter to do that.
If an anwser is not known like what "created/lit" our universe that does not mean that magic man had to do it it just means WE DO NOT KNOW YET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edited by frako, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-02-2011 4:31 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-02-2011 4:55 PM frako has not replied
 Message 260 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-06-2011 5:56 PM frako has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(1)
Message 263 of 349 (628110)
08-06-2011 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by Dawn Bertot
08-06-2011 5:56 PM


Re: Logic demands
I am always supprised how fare the religius bend scripture to suit their needs.
Big bang theory is science because the math holds up, the observable evidence holds up its predictions holds up.
Creation by magic does not hold up because we have yet to obsrve magic in action, it has no predictive capabilities, and the math does not hold up.
The theory of evolution and the fact of evolution hold up to the math, the evidence supports it, and its predictions hold up.
Creation of lifeforms by magic does not hold up ecause we have yet to obsrve magic in action, it has no predictive capabilities, and the math does not hold up.
Just because we do not understand something yet does not imply we have to use magic to explain it. A long time ago the earth was thought to be flat and floating on a giant turtle why noone knew the right anwser so they made something up, after that came the earth is the center of the universe theory noone knew so they made something up even locked people away who would say otherwise, not so long ago it was believed that life was made in its current form by a magic sky daddy noone knew so they made something up .....
You se where i am going with this if you cant back your claims up with evidence dont make shit up and preach it to be true just say we dont know it might save you some embarrisment in the future just ask the RCC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-06-2011 5:56 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 264 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-06-2011 9:18 PM frako has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(2)
Message 280 of 349 (628273)
08-08-2011 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by Dawn Bertot
08-06-2011 9:18 PM


Re: Logic demands
The good thing about the only two logical possibilites is that no amount of information ever gathered will provide an alternative suggestion, nor will it overthrow those choices. it cant be changed.
Why did the big bang go bang?
Scientist: we dont know
Creationist: creator
What was there before the big bang?
Scientist: we dont know
Creationist creator
Whyt started life?
Scientist: we have a few working hypothesis
Creationist: creator
How did life came to be as it is now
Scientist: Evolution
Creationist: creator
Why does gravitiy wor as it does?
Scientist: we are working on it we have some working hypothesis
Creationist: creator
........
Yea your creator theory works for everything lets jut dump all science down the drain and go with the creator theory it worked so well in the past remember the dark ages???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-06-2011 9:18 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 286 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-08-2011 10:02 PM frako has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(1)
Message 293 of 349 (628351)
08-09-2011 3:15 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by Dawn Bertot
08-08-2011 10:02 PM


Re: Logic demands
Instead of all of this, just look at the logical possibilites, because if you reject the scriptures, that is all you have. Wouldnt you agree
That would be the Viking scriptures right talk about a god right, he said im gonna deal wit those Ice giants once and for all and there has not been an ice giant around in thousands of years now that is what i call a miracle.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Dawn Bertot, posted 08-08-2011 10:02 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024