image issues

TBH: I have no idea about the demand, only that it is available on other BB's.As to the exact implementation, I would suggest that it expands to its actual size and ratio.
But that is an educated guess based on my experience as a developer, but that experience does not exactly translate into how BB images should work.Maybe CS has some input...

I implemented this a couple days ago and was waiting to see if CS would chime in. I decided that maintaining aspect ratio was the correct action when changing image size. It'll become available the next time I post an update.

I think the aspect ratio should stay the same. If I could just put in one number for the width, like it already does now and keeps the same aspect ratio, but then could also put in a comma and add "left" to align it to the left, then that would be really cool. Or visa versa: [img=left, 150] That there would be ideal.

You can do that now, just leave out the space after the comma: Sorry it's so picky about punctuation, I'll take a look at making it more flexible.

I've just released a couple minor improvements to the [img] and [thumb] dBCodes. You can now specify a height along with a width. For example, this would specify that the image be displayed at 100 pixels wide by 200 pixels high: If the actual image width is larger than the displayed image width then when you click on the image it will grow to it's actual width, but the aspect ratio of 100x200 will be maintained. In other words, the image will still be twice as high as wide, as seen here. The first image specifies only a width of 100, while the second specifies a width/height of 100x200, click on the images to see how aspect ratio is maintained: The other minor improvement is that extraneous white space around the arguments is ignored. For example, this now works: It would display like this: Edited by Admin, : Grammar.Edited by Admin, : Grammar again.Edited by Admin, : Rerender now that newly introduced image display bug is fixed.