Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 0/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Importance of Original Sin
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 1017 of 1198 (840622)
10-02-2018 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1015 by Faith
10-02-2018 4:37 PM


Re: Was there a squashed attempt at a "socialistic" Christian government pre 50/70 A.D.?
quote:
Do you see where it says they had the right to their possession? Clearly not. Context means nothing to you.
It says that he owned the land and had control of the money - the point being that he had no excuse for holding back. Nowhere does it say that holding some of the money back was acceptable - clearly it was not. That’s what you see if you read it in context.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1015 by Faith, posted 10-02-2018 4:37 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1018 by Faith, posted 10-02-2018 4:54 PM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 1022 of 1198 (840630)
10-02-2018 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1018 by Faith
10-02-2018 4:54 PM


Re: Was there a squashed attempt at a "socialistic" Christian government pre 50/70 A.D.?
Going back to the original point it is clear that they were expected to give everything to the nascent Church. Their failure to do so is even attributed to Satan’s influence.
I’ll also note that Peter is clearly setting himself up as God’s representative - to the point where lying to him (at least when he is acting as head of the Church) is lying to God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1018 by Faith, posted 10-02-2018 4:54 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024