Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Studying the supernatural
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 182 of 207 (637188)
10-14-2011 2:13 AM
Reply to: Message 180 by Rahvin
10-13-2011 5:02 PM


Supernatural
Rahvin writes:
Do you disagree? Why, or why not?
Yeah, I disagree. I don't disagree with everything but a lot. Not that it's wrong just that I have a different opinion.
How can I relate this to the common ancestor. When I say for instance where did the common ancestor come from or who is it you might say "chuck, that's abiogenesis, we're talking evolution".
Then I simply say, well alrighty then. I could tho say, that is also moving the goal posts.
So, when I say the mechanism behind the lightning is God, and you tell me im moving the goal posts, it seems unfair, to me.
Im more interested in origins than how the lightning works in relation to lightning being generated in an electrically charged storm system. (Even tho the method of cloud charging still remains elusive) So, slow down a little.
Now, nobody really thinks Thor or Zeus are up in the sky or on a high mountain tossing lightning bolts.
Well, I sure as hel dont. I believe God. The God of the Bible is the one who created that process and put it in motion. That is something that you nor I can prove or disprove. Like I said, I think it's more plausable to think some intelligence was behind such an awesome thing.
You will say, "well it's not that awesome anymore. We've explained it." When I learned how my cell phone worked it doesn't mean there was no designer just because I figured it out. Some one designed it to work the way it does. Even tho I don't know who or never seen him/her.
The key similarities? Everyone had seen lightning, and nobody had any idea what was going on.
Let's not get bogged down with everyone else. People make up all kinds of crazy things. Just because the greeks thought zeus was tossing electricity around doesn't means we should group all the SN into one big myth box.
What happened over the last few hundred years? We don't consider lightning to be "supernatural" any more, or even all that mysterious!
Ok, fine. It's not mysterious. How about miraculous? Amazing? Awesome? To be feared? Respected? Because it's not mysterious doesn't mean it wasn't created to work the awesome way it does.
We just stopped applying the "supernatural" descriptor because, with a well-supported theory for the actual mechanism at work, the phenomenon is no longer mysterious.
That is their problem. If they didn't care how things worked scientifically, so they only thought about one aspect and not the other. Does that mean that they were wrong to imply a greater being was responsible for what was happening? Can we have the best of both worlds? Why does it have to only be one? You are as guilty as them in implying only one explanation.
The only things "dismissed" or "refuted" were the competing hypotheses, made up in absolute ignorance, which had no actual tie to the very real phenomenon itself
It's not a [italics]competing[/italics] hypothesis, it's origins. Just like abiogenesis is not a competing hypothesis to The TOE.
But as our understanding grows...would we still consider Yahweh to be "supernatural?"
I don't think so.
Rahvin, you sound like Xongsmith there (not that that's a bad thing).
IF, we were able to detect God im not sure we would have any say in the matter how we choose to catargorize Him. The SN and the natural are entirely different. The natural is a different dimension that the SN.
If we who are natural detected the SN it just means we have detected the SN. It doesn't give us any special powers to start labeling things we are allowed to discover because we simply observed it. The SN is the SN.
I think, like lightning, we might look back at the old myths in light of our new knowledge, and chuckle a bit at the old theologies on "God," or at those who didn't think such things could exist.
I've been trying to tell you how God is. Why would we laugh? He is exaclty what He says He is. You are the one in the dark but doesn't have to be.
I would not be laughing but confirming what I already know to be true.
Although, right about now, after reading all that, you are the one laughing at me
Governor warren took the absence of evidence of a Japanese "Fifth Column" to be evidence that such a thing did actually exist!
Let's revisit a couple old friends. Apples...and oranges
I can clearly see what is around me at work. Wide out in the open. Warren could not see the soldiers hiding.
If the soldiers are lightning, he couldn't see the lightning. So, he would obviosly be wrong. I agree with you but not the correlation. Me, on the other hand, can see the lightning. Im not making things up.
Lightning doesn't strike at random.
Then PM me where the next strike will hit
I mean Rahvin, that it didn't just come to be because of randomness. It was purposed. It is the result of intelligence. It serves a purpose.
Prove it you say? I can't but maybe we can get to a point where you can start to believe that a SN being was the originator of it.
What's to lose?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Rahvin, posted 10-13-2011 5:02 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-15-2011 11:22 PM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 189 by Rahvin, posted 10-18-2011 8:06 PM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 183 of 207 (637211)
10-14-2011 5:07 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by Straggler
10-13-2011 7:18 AM


Straggler writes:
Firstly who says we can't test for the supernatural? Mod for one has explained in various places how he would test various supernatural claims.
Ok. Let's test the SN. I must have missed it. Which should we start the testing at? I already said my shoulder was healed and you dismissed it because what, you weren't there to see it?
Or prayer, was that one we could test? I think then, we need to test everyones understanding of prayer to see if it lines up with what God says. We have to pray His will for our prayer to be answered. His will is to heal us.
Test: Successful. I was healed. You ok with this test of ours so far?
Secondly - Haven't we been through all this with the whole 'Hogwarts Hypothesis' thing? That something cannot be tested is not a barrier in and of itself for rejecting it.
Yes. What's the problem? Then you're onboard that God created lightning? Or atleast it's a viable hypothesis?
Thirdly - The idea that the more natural explanations replace supernatural ones the more legitimate supernatural beliefs are is just pointlessly perverse to the point of ridiculous.
So, you claim steak to things explained and NOW it seems to things UNEXPLIANED as well? What's left for everyone else?
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Straggler, posted 10-13-2011 7:18 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Straggler, posted 10-14-2011 12:44 PM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 185 of 207 (637373)
10-15-2011 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 184 by Straggler
10-14-2011 12:44 PM


Straggler writes:
It has nothing to do with me being there to personally witness your belief based thinking.
Hmmm, yes, belief that He will do it again as proven from past experiences.
You have been told by me and others how prayer can be tested using double blind trials.
LOL Straggler. An atheist telling us how prayer can be tested. I've been told over and over by you atheists huh? That's gold man, gold.
If you mean something else by "God" you need to explain what exactly it is you are talking about.
What are you talking about?
Yikes man. Read the Bible. If we have to study up on evolution to debate it at all resonably then you should read and study up on God. The God of the Bible. God Almighty. Start in Genesis if you want. Don't you already know who im talking about? How can you not?
Straggler writes:
chuck writes:
So, you claim steak to things explained and NOW it seems to things UNEXPLIANED as well? What's left for everyone else?
Huh?
Im mean, if something is unexplained it goes in the unexplained column and sits there till explained and nothing else. No implying anything. When something IS explained science claims it as explained therefore natural causes, the whole nine yards. Saying nothing about it's origins or how it even originated or came into existance.
Science deals with the natural and CANNOT rule out the influence from the SN no matter how they or you spin it. They simply do not know just like you do not know. So stop saying you know because you have no clue.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by Straggler, posted 10-14-2011 12:44 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by Percy, posted 10-15-2011 8:58 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 187 by Straggler, posted 10-15-2011 10:07 AM Chuck77 has replied
 Message 190 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:46 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 191 of 207 (638410)
10-22-2011 1:31 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by Rahvin
10-18-2011 8:06 PM


Re: Supernatural
If im claiming that lightning was created of God (which I am) and then we were to study lightning (which has been done) then I suppose that science has already studied the SN. Only they didn't realize it.
What differenciates "supernatural" from "natural?" How do we tell the difference? What consistent rules can we use to tell whether a newly observed phenomenon is supernatural or natural?
Well, the natural world has laws that God put in place, gravity for instance. We can know that the laws of the natural will be obeyed no matter what we believe.
The SN world has laws too. Here is one you know of but probably don't think to much about:
You reap what you sow. IOW, what goes around comes around. That is SuperNatural Rahvin. That is not chance, it's not natural, and, it can be studied. It's happened in my life numerous times. It's a spiritual law God set in motion. There is no other way to explain it. It's a SN law.
We CAN differenciate the natural from the supernatural.
What do you see? What observations do you make that should change my mind? Why do you believe what you believe? How do you think you know it?
Well gee, that is a loaded question. You want to hear my whole spiritual experience? What I experience and how I know what I'm experiencing? In short, my spirt man is alive to God (who is a Spirit), now that i'm "born again". I am operating in the natural AND spiritual. You may see or hear or experience the SN but you wouldn't know it (necessarily). I would because my spirit man is alive and not dead (anymore).
I have a better question, Chuck. You seem pretty convinced that something supernatural exists.
Being convinced means that you've drawn a conclusion.
To draw a conclusion, you must have examined some evidence, and from there chosen what you felt to be the most likely hypothesis to explain that evidence.
In other words...you seem to have investigated the supernatural. The conclusion itself (whether you believe something supernatural does or not exist) is irrelevant to this topic. But since you must have investigated something supernatural in order to come up with a belief about it...
what convinced you, and why should I find that same thing convincing?
A born again Christian told me about God, that the way to Him was thru Jesus. After a few months of asking him questions over and over and over, I finally visited his church. After going there for a short while, I ended up giving my life to Christ and accepting what He did for me on the cross. My spirit was born again, I became alive unto God, and now have a relationship with the Creator of the universe. For the past 18 years i've experienced that relationship both in the natural and SN.
I did what the Bible said and am now reaping the benefits of putting my trust in Christ (the bridge to God) thru faith. Faith got me there, (believing without seeing) and that faith was rewarded. It's not a blind faith but (now) a knowing faith that God is real and that He exists, as well as the spirit world, or as you would call it, the SuperNatural.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Rahvin, posted 10-18-2011 8:06 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 4:05 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 207 by Rahvin, posted 10-24-2011 12:46 PM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 207 (638415)
10-22-2011 3:35 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Dr Adequate
10-15-2011 11:22 PM


Re: Supernatural
Dr A writes:
Now a God who is behind the natural would, granted, be supernatural but would also be indistiguishable from the natural with nothing behind it.
Granted, great.
What we need to see is some sort of suspension of the natural order.
What is it that you need God to do? Granted He created everything we see, what is it exactly, that would convince you? Im already convinced because He(God) has revealed Himself to me. What is it (other than finding out yourself once you accept Christ) that you need to see being suspended naturally?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-15-2011 11:22 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 3:58 AM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 193 of 207 (638416)
10-22-2011 3:41 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by Straggler
10-15-2011 10:07 AM


Straggler writes:
Get with the times Chuck. That's my advice.
Seriously? I'm going to forsake everything, my relationship with God? How He changed my life? What He's continued to do for me over the last 18 years (and before leadingt me to salvation) to get with the times? The times have no bearing on my experiences with my Heavenly Father who happens to be the Creator of this wonderful universe and incidently, who also Created you, Straggler. If i got with the times, i'd be left behind. Then, we'd both be lost.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by Straggler, posted 10-15-2011 10:07 AM Straggler has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by Larni, posted 10-22-2011 9:22 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 196 of 207 (638420)
10-22-2011 4:06 AM
Reply to: Message 194 by Dr Adequate
10-22-2011 3:58 AM


Re: Supernatural
Some sort of little hint like that would be useful for all of us, I feel.
Instead of writing notes in the sky with the Stars (big dipper?) how about He uses me to tell you about the Gospel and saving power of Jesus? That is pretty simple and to the point, isn't it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 3:58 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 4:13 AM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 198 of 207 (638423)
10-22-2011 4:27 AM
Reply to: Message 197 by Dr Adequate
10-22-2011 4:13 AM


Re: Supernatural
But it's not noticeably more supernatural than a Muslim telling me about the Koran.
How do you know that? You havn't even begun the journey INTO the supernatural yet. You are just looking for signs first. Im your sign right now. You can study me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 4:13 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 5:05 AM Chuck77 has replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 200 of 207 (638430)
10-22-2011 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 199 by Dr Adequate
10-22-2011 5:05 AM


Re: Supernatural
You're posting on a website.
I admit, you fooled me. I thought for a second we were having a discussion. I fell for it. Nevermind then.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 5:05 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2011 6:03 AM Chuck77 has not replied
 Message 204 by Son, posted 10-22-2011 7:49 AM Chuck77 has not replied

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 203 of 207 (638437)
10-22-2011 7:25 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by Panda
10-22-2011 7:04 AM


Re: Supernatural
Deleted. Taken to Discussion problems forum.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.
Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by Panda, posted 10-22-2011 7:04 AM Panda has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024