Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 61/28 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   This just in, Wisconsin Senators Pass Bill Pushing Abstinence Over Contraception
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 2 of 117 (639718)
11-03-2011 8:59 AM


I've ceased being dumbfounded about how conservative the US is.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Coyote, posted 11-03-2011 9:37 AM Larni has replied
 Message 6 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 10:15 AM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 8 of 117 (639735)
11-03-2011 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by frako
11-03-2011 9:12 AM


I recall getting mechanical sex education when I was in priamry school (about 10 years old).

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by frako, posted 11-03-2011 9:12 AM frako has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2011 7:18 PM Larni has replied
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 11-04-2011 1:04 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 9 of 117 (639736)
11-03-2011 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Coyote
11-03-2011 9:37 AM


I don't consider that "conservative."
Maybe I should have used a big 'C'.
Over here conservatism is inextricably linked with puritanical values, Victorian famliy values, and sticking heads in sand about things.
I guess I just always considered the American south as very conservative and conflated English Conservatism with American conservatism.
Happy to corrected.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Coyote, posted 11-03-2011 9:37 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 20 of 117 (639812)
11-04-2011 5:38 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Taz
11-04-2011 1:04 AM


We were given instruction on how sex was carried out but we were not taught about any of the emotional, social or cultural baggage that came with it.
Although in the early eighties in a small village in Oxfordshire the socio-cultural landscape was very WASP.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 11-04-2011 1:04 AM Taz has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 21 of 117 (639813)
11-04-2011 5:40 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by crashfrog
11-03-2011 7:18 PM


More like: CHEEP, CHEEP.
Believe it or not we were taught with graphic examples of chickens.
After trying it at home my cloaca didn't half hurt.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2011 7:18 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 31 of 117 (639866)
11-04-2011 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Artemis Entreri
11-04-2011 12:58 PM


Probably because it's not a conservative stance, this is just a place where people slander us.
Was my explanation and retraction insufficient?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Artemis Entreri, posted 11-04-2011 12:58 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Omnivorous, posted 11-04-2011 3:16 PM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024