Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Did The (Great Flood) Water Come From And Where Did It Go?
Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 2 of 432 (642538)
11-29-2011 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Trixie
11-29-2011 5:09 AM


Assuming you would like evidence for where the water came from and where it went, I don't think this would be off-topic for the Evidence for a recent flood thread.
Edited by Admin, : Remove sig.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Trixie, posted 11-29-2011 5:09 AM Trixie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Trixie, posted 11-29-2011 9:45 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 4 of 432 (642541)
11-29-2011 4:32 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the Where did the water come from and where did it go? thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 34 of 432 (642950)
12-02-2011 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Coyote
12-02-2011 9:10 PM


Re: Catastrophic (for creationists)
Hi Coyote,
In this thread Trixie is looking for consistency with the laws of science rather than evidence.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Coyote, posted 12-02-2011 9:10 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 36 of 432 (642953)
12-02-2011 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by ICANT
12-02-2011 10:22 PM


Re: Catastrophic (for creationists)
Hi ICANT,
Trixie is not asking for evidence. She's asking for clear descriptions of where the water came from and where it went, then she'd like to examine the offered scenarios for their compatibility with known science, in other words, whether they're scientifically feasible.
Edited by Admin, : Grammar.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by ICANT, posted 12-02-2011 10:22 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


(1)
Message 54 of 432 (643012)
12-03-2011 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ICANT
12-03-2011 6:49 PM


Re: It's your model!
Hi ICANT,
You're working very hard at being paranoid.
This thread is asking creationists to describe their model of where the water came from and where it went. In this thread it doesn't matter how the Bible is interpreted to arrive at the model. No one will dispute any Biblical interpretation because this thread was not intended to discuss Biblical interpretations. That's all that Trixie meant when she said, "This isn't a topic for arguing what the text says." Its for discussing the model from a scientific perspective. How the Bible was interpreted to arrive at the model doesn't matter.
So if you want to discuss how the Bible was interpreted in order to determine where the water came from and where it went, then this is the wrong thread. That would be a topic for a different thread.
All this thread is asking is for creationists to describe their model so that it can be examined and discussed from a scientific perspective.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ICANT, posted 12-03-2011 6:49 PM ICANT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Trixie, posted 12-04-2011 5:47 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024