So then the big question. If in the SETI case, IP would be suspected just at the detection of a narrow bandwidth (completely void of knowing the existence of R or not), why then when we very clearly have the presence of T, R, and O in the case of DNA code, is it not considered to be IP?
Partly because we do not "clearly" have the presence of "T", "R" and "O" in the case of DNA, and partly because your criterion is not used by scientists 'cos of being stupid.
But you already have a thread on which to be wrong about this subject. Why butt in here to be daft on a thread specifically intended to get away from generalized creationist stupidity and to just deal with SETI?