|
Author
|
Topic: Chat/Comment thread
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 6 of 337 (646097)
01-03-2012 4:29 AM
|
Reply to: Message 4 by Jon
01-02-2012 8:41 PM
|
|
Re: Random Musings
I think Phat is saying that we will always be found wanting but his god can provide support for that eventuality.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 4 by Jon, posted 01-02-2012 8:41 PM | | Jon has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: SWTOR
Bah. MMOs owe me too much time since I got caught in the great Evercrack wave of 2000. And Mary Sue Jedi's need to be killed on sight.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 26 of 337 (646204)
01-03-2012 4:29 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Stile
01-03-2012 1:20 PM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
I totally concur. I'm going to get around to doing the Armoury when I get some spare time with my solider.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 16 by Stile, posted 01-03-2012 1:20 PM | | Stile has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 27 of 337 (646205)
01-03-2012 4:30 PM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by Shield
01-03-2012 2:55 PM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
I have a cut down version on my iPad that's pretty fun.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 22 by Shield, posted 01-03-2012 2:55 PM | | Shield has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 28 of 337 (646206)
01-03-2012 4:32 PM
|
|
|
My Xbox GT is LarniEvC, if anyone is interested.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: SWTOR
Lol. I was using Mary Sue in it's prejoritive sense.
Mary Sue Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: SWTOR
I would get sick of the force users (specifically the Jedi) being an order of magnitude better than non-force users in the films and the RPG. Mary Sue is a term for perfect characters who seems to gain powers on demand (the EU is rife with this). Jedi, to me seem holier than thou 'lawful stupids' who stamped out other force traditions through out the 20,000 yrs of modern history. It would be great if this was not the case is SWOTOR. Abe: just realised that I'm ranting. I did not think Star Wars meant so much to me, lol. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: SWTOR
That's the case also with the D&D free to play MMO. In app purchases seem to be the new model.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 47 of 337 (646244)
01-03-2012 7:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by Shield
01-03-2012 7:06 PM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
Well, that rant was the most exercise that fat bastard got all year, I reckon. Nice picture of Leia, though.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 46 by Shield, posted 01-03-2012 7:06 PM | | Shield has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 48 by Shield, posted 01-03-2012 7:57 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 49 of 337 (646248)
01-03-2012 8:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Shield
01-03-2012 7:57 PM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
How can the people who care for him let him (and his lard arse brother) get that big? I'm a bit drunk right now (I don't go back to work till 9th Jan) and can't help but laugh at the fat fuck but really, it's pretty shameful.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by Shield, posted 01-03-2012 7:57 PM | | Shield has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 57 of 337 (646269)
01-03-2012 9:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 53 by Buzsaw
01-03-2012 8:36 PM
|
|
Re: The [i]"I'm Drunk" Alibi
Possibly: but the lad is a fat bastard who should be ashamed of himself. This I declare.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 01-03-2012 8:36 PM | | Buzsaw has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 61 of 337 (646303)
01-04-2012 6:30 AM
|
Reply to: Message 59 by crashfrog
01-03-2012 9:48 PM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
You can't be serious that Jabba the Hutt there is in any way as healthy as he would be if he was not carrying all that pork around. I did put in time of Res 5 but I also put time in at the gym. What surprises me is that he is not embarrassed by how he looks. But now I'm worried that I'm starting to sound like a US conservative moaning about people not spending money on health insurance. Abe: over here any one who drinks, eats too much or smokes puts a disproportionate pressure on the nhs. People die because fatties, smokers and drinkers can't control themselves. Edited by Larni, : Abe
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 59 by crashfrog, posted 01-03-2012 9:48 PM | | crashfrog has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 63 of 337 (646311)
01-04-2012 8:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 62 by Dogmafood
01-04-2012 7:30 AM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
I suppose it must be different in countries where you personally pay for your own medical treatment. I can't argue with free choice to be morbidly obese but I think it should be discouraged in the same way that smoking is discouraged. What's the real difference?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 62 by Dogmafood, posted 01-04-2012 7:30 AM | | Dogmafood has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 65 of 337 (646317)
01-04-2012 9:24 AM
|
Reply to: Message 64 by crashfrog
01-04-2012 8:44 AM
|
|
Re: SWTOR
Obsesity is massive factor for health and there is no way that guy could have any level of fitness. Obesity - Wikipedia But if you are going to call me an asshole you can fuck off
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 64 by crashfrog, posted 01-04-2012 8:44 AM | | crashfrog has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 69 of 337 (646324)
01-04-2012 9:49 AM
|
Reply to: Message 66 by Stile
01-04-2012 9:45 AM
|
|
Re: Rage
I never played to Borderlands co op. I heard horror stories of modded cheaters buggering up saves.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 66 by Stile, posted 01-04-2012 9:45 AM | | Stile has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 76 by Stile, posted 01-04-2012 10:07 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2