Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Irrefutable Public Health Care Thread
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 19 of 314 (649613)
01-24-2012 3:29 PM


Seems to me (from my rarified outsider view) that it would be a very Republican thing to do to have universal health care paid by the workers via taxes.
That would relieve the burden on all those poor business that currently contribute to their workers health care plans.
When will people wake up and realise that big business needs all the government support it can get?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Taq, posted 01-24-2012 5:21 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 23 of 314 (649686)
01-25-2012 4:58 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Taq
01-24-2012 5:21 PM


The Republican plan is to give each person $2,000 dollars in tax credits to spend on private health insurance.
So with a popn of 312,905,000 (lets half that figure to get rid of non eligables) or 156,452,500 each getting $2,000.
This means the spend would be $312,905,000,000.
Really?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Taq, posted 01-24-2012 5:21 PM Taq has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 25 of 314 (649694)
01-25-2012 5:57 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Tangle
01-25-2012 5:26 AM


Privatising the NHS.
politician tinker with it at their peril.
Don't be too sure of that, mate.
I've worked for the NHS PCT for 10 years and this year my (adult mental health) department in the PCT has become a Community Interest Company.
Privatised in all but name: if what was my department of the PCT does can be under cut by 'any willing provider' bam! I''m out of a job.
So we can expect to see wages forced down as the loweset tender can (and will) be accepted by the NHS comisioners.
Times was when providing and comisioning were all provided byt the NHS. Now the NHS subcontacts out to private providers who get to keep the NHS brand.
Now the suggestion that GPs hold all the funding: so they refer people to private providers on which they hold a directorship. There is nothing to preven this from happening.
And they have thier sights set on my pension, the fuckers.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Tangle, posted 01-25-2012 5:26 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Tangle, posted 01-25-2012 6:48 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 28 by Omnivorous, posted 01-25-2012 8:52 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 41 of 314 (649723)
01-25-2012 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Omnivorous
01-25-2012 8:52 AM


Re: Privatising the NHS.
Once you get rid of that nanny umbilical, you'll be truly free. Soon, without any pensions, public healthcare or other government intrusions into the natural market, we'll all be rich as kings.
God bless America.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Omnivorous, posted 01-25-2012 8:52 AM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024