EvC Forum: Evolution is not Abiogenesis

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Evolution is not Abiogenesis

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9197

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.2

Normal Thread Display

(2)

Message 37 of 251 (653631)
02-23-2012 8:39 AM

Reply to: Message 22 by Tangle
02-23-2012 3:09 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw

He will just start posting nonsense as he always does and make claims with no evidence.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 22 by Tangle, posted 02-23-2012 3:09 AM		Tangle has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9197

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.2

Normal Thread Display

(1)

Message 38 of 251 (653632)
02-23-2012 8:42 AM

Reply to: Message 24 by Chuck77
02-23-2012 4:10 AM

Re: Message from Buzsaw

I believe the literal interpretation of Genesis and believe abiogenesis and evolution should not be seperated.

Well what you believe has no effect on reality and evidently reality has no effect on your beliefs.

Basically. You are wrong.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 24 by Chuck77, posted 02-23-2012 4:10 AM		Chuck77 has not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9197

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.2

Normal Thread Display

Message 175 of 251 (654722)
03-03-2012 9:41 AM

Reply to: Message 163 by marc9000
03-02-2012 8:26 PM

Re: Analogies

Here's a list of some "nonexistant" peer reviewed publications by ID proponents. Were you not aware that any of this existed? I haven't noticed any excitement by anyone in the scientific community.

This is actually kind of funny. Let look at the journals that these "peer reviewed" articles were published in and the articles themselves.

The first is by a surgeon and published in a very obscure journal.
Here is a pretty scathing takedown of this article. You do realize that publication does not make it true or even accepted by the scientific community don't you?

Now lets look at Bio-Complexity. Not a real objective "journal". Gee, it is the publication of the Biologic Institute. The Biologic Institute is an arm of the Discovery Institute. Enough said. Do the research yourself.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 163 by marc9000, posted 03-02-2012 8:26 PM		marc9000 has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 176 by Admin, posted 03-03-2012 9:49 AM		Theodoric has seen this message but not replied

Theodoric

Member

Posts: 9197

From: Northwest, WI, USA

Joined: 08-15-2005

Member Rating: 3.2

Normal Thread Display

Message 184 of 251 (654822)
03-04-2012 9:10 PM

Reply to: Message 179 by marc9000
03-04-2012 8:46 PM

Topic? Anything?

It’s a short list, but it’s not the zero that evolutionists constantly claim. ID proponents are constantly accused of dishonesty when they ask questions and express doubt about evolutionist claims. Opinions aren’t necessarily dishonesty, but misrepresentations like this about zero peer-reviewed papers is. Not accusing you personally, but that’s happened in this thread. Can’t keep straight who says what when I have many opponents.

Do any of them talk about Evolution = Abiogenesis? If not they are meaningless in this thread. Do you have anything to show that Evolution = Abiogenesis?

Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
	Message 179 by marc9000, posted 03-04-2012 8:46 PM		marc9000 has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

3 online now:	Aussie, Omnivorous, PaulK
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,792 Year: 4,049/9,624 Month: 920/974 Week: 247/286 Day: 8/46 Hour: 0/3