I've heard this argument before and fail to understand how, initially at least, it would harm anyone but lower income people.
It would 'hurt' everyone. Imagine all those poor people staying home more often because getting anywhere is a pain in the ass.
You going to force them to finance a $50,000 hybrid/electric vehicle with the credit and down payment they don't have? Raising fuel prices isn't going to harm congress, rich people or ANY government officials.
If you read jar's post carefully, you see that the idea isn't just to get away from using gas-powered cars; the idea is to completely reformat society from how it is now, where people are required to commute into a large central city on a daily basis, to something more small-term, where people live in smaller communities with most of the work within walking, biking, or city bus distance.
Why should the lower class be the first and hardest hit?
So long as the upper class remains in power with the resources to weather any hits, the lower class will always be the first and hardest hit.
But we're all open to suggestions. What do
you propose?
Jon
Love your enemies!