Tangle writes:
As we don't look likely to get any opinion at all now from the creation side of the argument, can we dream up any defence at all for them?
If we so-called evolutionists have to create the talking points for ICR, AIG, DI and the like, they may as well raise the white flag.
Yup, that good ol' DNA. Darwin predicted it, scientists use it to create cladistic diagrams which, oh my seem to so often completely agree with evolution derived from ancestry using physiology, and now we have all that evidence against a simultaneous bottleneck in the genetic code of all multicellular life.
After being at war with geology and biology what will they declare war on next? chemistry? physics?... mathematics?
Oh, pardon me, I see they already have.
Now do they really expect us to come up with arguments for them?
Next thing you know they will expect us to read the Bible for them.
Oh. pardon me, I see they already have.
Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider. - Francis Bacon
™ Version 4.2
