Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,864 Year: 4,121/9,624 Month: 992/974 Week: 319/286 Day: 40/40 Hour: 6/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No genetic bottleneck proves no global flood
vimesey
Member (Idle past 100 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


(1)
Message 110 of 140 (721210)
03-05-2014 7:02 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Faith
03-05-2014 5:17 AM


Re: Neutral, deleterious or beneficial
Of course you can.
Words can have different meanings in different contexts. Take "proof". In mathematics, it refers to a demonstration, absolutely and without any other possibility, that a mathematical proposition is correct - it's an on/off switch - something is absolute or not - there are no nuances.
In criminal law, (in my country at least), it means proof beyond reasonable doubt. And in civil law, it means proof on the balance of probabilities. So it's very nuanced in law.
Different contexts, different meanings.
So if you change context, and the common usage of a word in that context is different from the usage in a previous context, you need to change your meaning. Tan isn't deciding what words mean - as an expert in the field, Tan is telling you how the word is used in the relevant context. I grant you, it's a slight pain, but it's the way it is.

Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Faith, posted 03-05-2014 5:17 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Faith, posted 03-05-2014 7:15 AM vimesey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024