Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Queen Elizabeth and the U.K.?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 68 of 102 (657395)
03-28-2012 7:33 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Straggler
03-28-2012 5:35 AM


Her role seems to be that of a rather pointless rubber stamper.
Well, she's the Head of State. For a couple of states, actually.
In the US, the Head of State is the same person as the Head of Government, and there's quite a bit of thought that it causes us no end of problems, because it means that you can't be politically opposed to the administration of the Head of Government without, essentially, being in opposition to the embodied State. People often wonder why American politics is so much more tenacious than in other countries, and I think that's part of the reason.
Not having a King or Queen doesn't mean you get to avoid the boring ceremony - memorials, awards, etc. Having a Queen means that you have someone specifically dedicated to the task. In our system of government, Barack Obama has to take time out of running the country in order to pin medals on soldiers. I think we'd be better of with some old bint to handle all that stuff.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Straggler, posted 03-28-2012 5:35 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Straggler, posted 03-28-2012 8:39 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024