|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 0/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Creationist Shortage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Buzsaw writes:
Links or it never happened. ...and now member Percy is demanding that I cease and desist posting on topic messages relating to how commodity goods made investors of it wealthy while $$ assets infate, becoming ever more worthless making these people less wealthy. He cited Dr Adequate's response as well, demanding no more responses relating to my message. He's made similar demands, even at FreeForAll.Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
GM writes:
imho, I don't think GDR has displayed having particularly thick skin - I don't think he has needed to. GDR and Catholic Scientist for example have thick skins and give as good as they get. He simply doesn't encourage/deserve posts that could be considered abusive. Certainly, I have seen some strong discussions take place, but they were gentlemanly in nature. Although it sounds like I am cheer-leading for GDR, I simply wished to point out that not all creationists should be tarred with the same brush. Just sayin'. Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Bolder-dash writes:
A bare-faced lie. AND ALTHOUGH VIRTUALLY ANYTHING THEY SAY WILL EITHER BE CENSORED Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Buzsaw writes:
Nice try at pretending that you know what you are saying, but it is completely undermined by the fact you failed to produce a cogent sentence. Not sure, but likely relating to how the Crysper System applies the DNA factor, relative to macro-evolution, more-so than for evolution of species. But it is interesting to see your dishonesty - "before your God as witness". Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
foreveryoung writes:
Once again you show your true face: hatred and violence. If I told you want I wanted to do to some of you guys after reading your posts, it would not only get me banned but would result in cops banging on my front door.Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Tangle writes:
/agree
I don't believe there are any better moderated discussion boards... Tangle writes:
And even if you don't, you get suspended many times before being perma-banned. If you keep to the rules and follow advice...Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
FEY writes:
As CrashFrog said, I have very little regard for you. You and many here show true hatred and violence toward creationists on almost every post. What? You don't think you do because you don't make overt and obvious posts like I do? You and most of the anti-creationists on this board ooze hatred toward creationists from every pore. It is built into your DNA. You have done it all of your life, so it has got to the point where it is just a part of daily life for you. In short, when you point a finger at me regarding my character, you have three fingers pointing right back at you. You are just another arrogant , fucking hypocrite.To hate you would be to elevate you beyond the standing of being "just another random poster on a forum". So, since I know I don't hate you, why would you make such claims?Perhaps the answer lies here: quote: quote: Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Bolder-dash writes:
We understand your struggle with reality. Am I allowed to give you a warning for being off topic Percy, like Dr.A always does, or RAZD or Jar...? Your behaviour is forgiven. /pat Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
So, your reply is just a long-winded version of "I know you are, but what am I?".
/patGo on. Go and play outside now. Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
nwr writes:
Separate from (and including) the E. vs C. debate, I fervently hope this is true. I'm guessing, but I suspect that this is due to the increasing role of the Internet. It has become quite hard to keep those children ignorant.CRYSTALS!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
marc9000 writes:
That is because there is no relationship between them.
...yet there is no sub-forum that examines the relationship between evolution and atheism. marc9000 writes:
You don't need a whole forum. If that sub-forum existed, I believe I would have a renewed interest in starting threads and posting more than I currently do.Just propose a thread. CRYSTALS!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
marc9000 writes:
True. I know that’s the politically correct mantra, but there’s plenty of evidence that shows there is. The word "evidence" isn't the exclusive property of evolutionists. Perhaps you could provide some? marc9000 writes:
Can you give me an example of this happening? As things are now, if I propose a thread about the relationship between evolution and atheism, it gets buried somewhere in the coffee house, or free for all forumsWhat thread did you propose that ended up in in the Coffee House or Free For All? marc9000 writes:
Do you know what a loaded question is? This new forum could have the descriptive line; Do evolutionists start out as atheists? Or do they study evolution first and then become atheists?Do you know why it is dishonest? Do you think a dishonest forum title is the best way to start a debate? marc9000 writes:
If I provide a list of 'evolution' books authored by men will that show a link from 'evolution' to 'being male'?
The descriptive line that I suggested above, about what the mindset is of beginning evolutionists/atheists could be applied to the authors of the following books; marc9000 writes:
This forum is filled with 'evolutionists' that have no political health to risk. Evolutionists don’t want to discuss some things about evolution. It’s not politically healthy for them.It is the creationists that are absent, remember? Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.CRYSTALS!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
marc9000 writes:
Which is you confirming that you have only read 1 of the 14 books you listed. Why do you pretend to know what I’ve read? Are you trying to say that those books have different content than their titles suggest? Their reviews say otherwise, as do the contents of Stenger’s book, which I actually have on my shelf. If you can't be bothered to read the books, then why should I? And even if I did, you could not discuss their contents, because you haven't read them. marc9000 writes:
Which is patently not true. 7-7-12) this thread, with no new references to the book list. This becomes obvious when we realise that you are replying to a post discussing your book list! So...you have a list of books you haven't read. Great!But I think you'll find that this list refutes your list: If that doesn't convince you, then maybe this will: www.google.com!(I haven't read it all, but I am sure it contains mountains of evidence that proves you wrong.) CRYSTALS!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Buzsaw writes:
It would seem appropriate that when replying to a request for evidence that you actually provide some. Sure, Jar. Over the years I've cited pages of observable evidence pertaing to history, fulfilled biblical prophecy, archeological discoveries etc, whereas you schooled members have produced no observable evidence for the alleged zero singularity, the BB, alleged biogenesis or early life following it. Do you not think it strange that you didn't? tbh: Your repeated claims to have evidence and repeated refusal to provide any is becoming laughable (and a little bit sad).CRYSTALS!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3734 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Buzsaw writes:
You have only ever repetitively repeated that you have evidence: you have never provided any. Why should I repetitivly repete evidence that you all reject, not willing to admit to one Biblical miracle? Your inability to even attempt to provide a link to your evidence is clearly indicative of a complete lack of evidence to support your claims.
Buzsaw writes:
I figure it is because defending biblical literalism is an adventure into futility - especially when you have no evidence. Go figure why creationists regard this site as an adventure into futility? Edited by Panda, : No reason given.CRYSTALS!!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024