Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Dinosaurs live with man?
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 147 of 373 (696024)
04-11-2013 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-11-2013 9:02 AM


Fire-breathing dragons constructed from dinosaur fossils?
Don't think so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-11-2013 9:02 AM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-11-2013 10:31 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(2)
Message 174 of 373 (696285)
04-14-2013 4:58 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by Alfred Maddenstein
04-14-2013 12:54 AM


Re: The cat...
Alfred Maddenstein writes:
So, still dancing around the bush and the issue together with Coy Boy, Inadequate? Like a pretty shy girl, dear? It's either that the soft tissues can possibly take 190 million years to not finish decomposing or they can not.
They can take much longer. Depends on things like the method of preservation.
Fossils trapped trapped in amber, for example. Two mites, trapped in fossilized tree resin, broke the record for ancient amber-preserved arthropods with an age of 230 million years. You can even have a look at the photo's, yourself.
http://www.sciencenews.org/...dest_mites_in_amber_discovered
Traces of blood can be preserved for at least 20 million years as a fossil with traces of it's own blood was found in amber. 20 million years old.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...1004_spider_blood.html
Beats 6 000 years.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-14-2013 12:54 AM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 04-14-2013 5:25 PM Pressie has not replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 298 of 373 (698552)
05-08-2013 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 296 by Huntard
05-08-2013 1:27 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Huntart writes:
Could you please tell me why god thought it was a good idea to equip plant eaters like T-Rex with those nice dagger like teeth?
T-Rex only ate tomatoes. Lots and lots of them. Tomatoes were thus in danger of going extinct.
Before The Flood, ripe tomatoes were big and the green tomatoes were small. T-Rex needed a method to delicately seperate the ripe tomatoes from the green one's.
The ripe tomatoes stuck between the teeth where they could be torn from the plant in one head-jerk, while the green tomatoes slipped through the gaps between the teeth and stayed on the plants.
The teeth were thus intelligently designed for tomatoes to survive till after The Flood. As T-Rex didn't eat tomatoes after The Flood, green tomatoes became just as big as ripe tomatoes . Those teeth were thus intelligently designed for tomatoes to survive.
Does that answer your question?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by Huntard, posted 05-08-2013 1:27 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Huntard, posted 05-08-2013 1:58 AM Pressie has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


(1)
Message 301 of 373 (698558)
05-08-2013 4:19 AM
Reply to: Message 300 by Huntard
05-08-2013 1:58 AM


Re: Density of a quackademic skull
Just imagine those Great Whites nibbling on celery sticks!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by Huntard, posted 05-08-2013 1:58 AM Huntard has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024