|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Rape victim denied emergency contraception based on religious beliefs of the doctor. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
StrawberryPatchBug Junior Member (Idle past 5964 days) Posts: 13 Joined: |
I caught the very end of a report on CNN last night about doctors refusing emergency contraception to women who have been raped because the practice does not fit with their religious doctrin. Then I did a little research this morning and found a case not too far from where I live.
Speaking Freely: Rape victim denied emergency contraception in ER This particular doctor was insensitive enough to equate the womans pursute of medical help in this area with buying a pair of jeans.
"People drive to Reading to buy jeans. Even if that were the case, that you had to drive to Reading to get this [prescription], to me that does not rise to a compulsion that you have to pass laws that [doctors] have to do something."
This notion terrifies me as a women who if caught in such a horrible situation, might not be able to find the help I need.I just wanted to get some opinions on this and the similar subject of certain pharmacies denying customers the right to prescribed contraceptives. Edited by StrawberryPatchBug, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPhat Inactive Member |
Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Just goes to show how religion can make good people do awfull things.
Lucky for us Brits that can't happen. My girlfriend is a Midwife and one of her colleagues gor into real trouble for not providing information to patient about abortion. The beliefs of the practitioner have no place in the medical work place.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IrishRockhound Member (Idle past 4436 days) Posts: 569 From: Ireland Joined: |
My mother is a practicing pharmacist, and I asked her once about this thing of US pharmacists refusing to dispense contraceptives because of their beliefs. I asked her if she could or would ever refuse to dispense because of her beliefs (she's Catholic).
She looked at me like I had two heads, and when I said I was actually serious, she said no, under no circumstances could she ever refuse to dispense medication for personal reasons. They can refuse if they don't have the medicine in stock, or if they have reason to believe the prescription is a fake, or if the customer is being abusive. She made a good point then - if she was going to refuse because of religious beliefs, where would you draw the line? At contraception? Stop selling condoms? What if she refused to dispense to homosexuals, Wiccans, or any person that her religion disapproves of? She said, and rightly so, that a prescription showed that a qualified doctor had seen someone and decided they needed medication - a pharmacist should not and cannot make that decision after the fact. In Ireland, in case you don't know, we have a drugs scheme where expensive and life-saving drugs are available to people who might not be able to afford them, because they only pay a small set amount and the government pays the rest. A pharmacist who refuses to dispense on religious grounds is being unneccessarily cruel and indifferent to the needs of others.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.0 |
That's disgraceful. I'm truly shocked to read of such casual disregard for medical ethics. Then again, perhaps I shouldn't be surprised. This sort of behaviour is typical of the kind of fundamentalist who isn't satisfied with merely following their own faith, but wants everybody else to follow it as well, whether they like it or not.
Also, I can't help but wonder if this is constitutional. If public funding were involved in funding the doctor, or the med's or most especially the pharmacist, wouldn't that breach the woman's First Amendment rights? Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
StrawberryPatchBug Junior Member (Idle past 5964 days) Posts: 13 Joined: |
Well in the case of the doctors they are actually obligated to help anyone seeking emergency contraception find another doctor who will offer it. In a lot of cases this isn't happening and even when it does, using this kind of method is very time sensitive and if a woman who has been raped has to wait a few days to find someone else it might just be too late.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2170 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Goddamned fucking woman-hating religious assholes!!!!
Sorry, there was no ther way to say it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jazzns Member (Idle past 3911 days) Posts: 2657 From: A Better America Joined: |
The first thought I had about this is who do you think is the worse victimizer of this poor woman? The doctor or the rapist?
With the rapist, you have someone who is initially recieved as a horrible person doing a horrible act. With the doctor, you have someone who is expected to be your ally at your time of need doing a horrible act. What do you think? Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
With the rapist, you have someone who is initially recieved as a horrible person doing a horrible act. What makes you think that's true? Usually, the rapist is a man the victim is already quite familiar with. Personally I don't think doctors should have the freedom to withhold treatment for religious reasons. We allow doctors to practice medicine because it's in the public interest, that's why they need licenses. Thus, they're obligated to serve the public interest. If providing patient care violates their religious beliefs then they have an obligation to cease the practice of medicine. They can't have it both ways. Is that worse than being raped? I wouldn't presume to know. It's certainly not a good thing when the victim of a rape is betrayed by somebody who is supposed to help them. But I notice a lot of American doctors doing things like that, these days. It honestly seems like I live in the one country in the world where doctors expect to get paid doctor salaries to not practice medicine. It's ridiculous.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
Is that worse than being raped? no, i'd say. potentially equal as it is once again someone else claiming control over your body. but it's presumably less violent. however, being forced by this person who is supposed to be your healer to potentially carry a child that will remind you every second of every day of the vile and violent act perpetrated against you for the better part of a year, i'd say the consequences could be worse than had he been helpful and a healer. this woman is your patient. your obligation to do no harm is to her, not some vague idea of a child that probably doesn't exist anyways. it is my personal opinion that if people don't want to practice medicine, they should find a new job.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
How dare they!!!!! You get a wick, I'll get a torch, Honey.You get a wick, I'll get a torch, Babe. You get a wick, I'll get a torch, We'll set a re on the doctor's porch... Honey, Baby mine. Any takers?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
StrawberryPatchBug Junior Member (Idle past 5964 days) Posts: 13 Joined: |
I think you make a great point about the woman being victimized a second time by again having no control of her body. Thoughts like this really terrify me because I am a woman and these are issues that I think all women have to think about. What happens if I am caught in such a horrible situation? To think that it would be that much more difficult having to go to a doctor that is judging you instead of offering sympathy and is trying to make life decisions for you based on their beliefs instead of giving you the care you need. A women couldn't help but feel totally without any control which offers nothing but deeper psychological damage. And for any doctor to even imply that a woman should carry the child of the man who raped her goes against the code of "do no harm" to a ridiculous degree.
I am personally scared because Pennsylvania seems to be the next in line for legislation in favor of these zealot doctors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
judging you instead of offering sympathy and is trying to make life decisions for you based on their beliefs instead of giving you the care you need. and that is really the issue with fundamentalists in general, doctor or not. and that is precisely what jesus wasn't about.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5500 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
SPB writes:
I regard this as functionally equivalent to gays demanding their same-sex marriage rights. Religio-medicine is as queer to American modernity as homo-matrimony. doctors refusing emergency contraception to women who have been raped because the practice does not fit with their religious doctrin. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I regard this as functionally equivalent to gays demanding their same-sex marriage rights. How so? In one situation, you have doctors asserting a civil right to deny another person's civil rights. In the other, two people are requesting a civil right that other people want to deny them. I don't see anything functionally equivalent, except where religion, as always, makes people behave like douchbags.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024