Seems you are still misrepresenting what I posted.
Did you look at the OP?
Did you read the OP?
Do you read what you write?
That the drawing represents a beam, catwalk, stadium seats, bridge or any of a dozen or more other objects is irrelevant to the questions asked in the OP.
The question in the OP was,
taz writes:
So, by looking at it, what does your feeling tell you about the point(s) of failure?
and my response was,
jar writes:
Absolutely nothing. The drawing is without meaning and contains far too many ambiguities to give even a hint about the failure mode.
This is not a matter of semantics, it is a reply to the question. Very few people deal with how a bridge is supported or the variations of support attachments in a Ames chair, they sit on it or cross it.
Everyone in this discussion recognized that the diagram represented a bridge (or similar) but that was not the question asked, was it?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!